Ten signs of progress for the 2008 Horns

kchorn

250+ Posts
Here is an intuitive report on the progress of the 2008 Horns in our preseason practice sessions to this point.

(10) Overall, the 2008 Horns are coming together as a team (certainly on defense, and possibly on offense) -- in no small part because of Muschamp (on defense) and Mack's apparent determination to follow-up on the success that the Horns' offense experienced in the 2007 Holiday Bowl by opening up the opportunity for our most talented players to participate, on a substantive basis, in the action [e.g., we appear to be including John Chiles (6-2, 215) and Malcolm Williams (6-3, 218) as meaningful members of our offense, and we appear to be taking seriously the notion of creating some unpredictability in our running game].

(9) Offensive line - this unit, by all accounts, is significantly improved. Quality depth is a big part of that improvement, but two sophomore players in particular -- Michael Huey (6-5, 315) and Kyle Hix (6-7, 320) -- may be better this season than anyone anticipated. And there is another pleasant surprise in the form of true freshman David Snow (6-4, 300) who appears to be a "player" right now (even being compared to Justin Blalock), and Snow reportedly can help the Horns at virtually any OL playing position, including center -- in other words, he's similar to Chris Hall (also 6-4, 300) in that respect. Right now, we could be looking at a starting lineup of Hix and Ulatoski at the tackles, Dockery and Huey at the guards, and Hall at center -- that group has the potential to be formidable by the time we get to Dallas (October 11).

(8) Receivers - just having Malcolm Williams "pan out" could change the whole picture for this unit, because it would give the 2008 Horns the big (and fast) WR we need -- split out in our basic offensive set -- as a downfield threat who has the football speed and physical strength to fight off a cornerback and beat him one-on-one on a deep pass. That, of course, would help to open things up underneath for Quan & Jordan, who really are good (and experienced) at their craft ... and both Shipley and Cosby could also slip downfield occasionally themselves. But we need Williams to take away some double-team pressure (and also loosen up the zone defense) for Quan & Jordan. Blaine Irby looks like the starter at TE, but that playing position (with promising redshirt-sophomore Josh Marshall hurt) does not appear to be a strength of this team -- particularly in terms of depth.

(7) RB - the bad news here is that Fozzy reportedly injured his knee (but no one knows, at this point, how serious it is). Vondrell can save us here, but obviously the quality depth is shallow ... and this situation just underscores the importance (imo) of getting John Chiles (6-2, 215, 4.4) involved in the 2008 Horns' offense in a combination Tebow (backup QB)/McFadden (backup RB)/Harvin (backup WR) role. The running-game "scheme" arguably is the critical issue here, and the news on that front -- so far -- is positive [see paragraph (10) above].

(6) QB - take it any way you wish, but the word out of camp is that "both" Colt and John are looking good at quarterback ... and that Chiles actually has improved his passing. Of course, you could make the rejoinder -- improved from what -- but Mack may have reasons, apart from John's own personal interest in playing QB, for keeping Chiles involved at that playing position. It is possible for John to help us as a QB, just as he did (and maybe more so, with even a minimal passing threat) in the 2007 Holiday Bowl. The reports on Sherrod are more vague, but he has dual-threat talent and you have to be glad that he's there to help us as needed. Meanwhile, Colt should return to form this year -- but to do that, we're going to need a "team" effort on offense ... with better team chemistry and leadership on that side of the line of scrimmage than last year.

(5) DE - we're loaded here, and -- ironically -- one of the players who could help us is Henry Melton. Eddie Jones is showing up, and Aaron Lewis apparently is fully recovered from surgery (Lewis can help both at DE and DT) ... plus you have Brian Orakpo and Sam Acho drawing raves ... and Sergio Kindle is in both the OLB and DE picture. We appear to be A+ at this important playing position -- which, as we all know, can be critical in helping to pressure opposing QBs into mistakes vs. our young secondary.

(4) DT - depth here is a mystery, but the two starters (Roy Miller and Lamarr Houston) are drawing raves. The 2008 Horns could use some help from the football gods here on the (avoiding) injury front. Houston could be a surprise star for Texas this Fall.

(3) LB - the irony here is that Rashad Bobino really is a good football player, but so is Jared Norton -- and Muschamp says they're "even" at this point and both will see significant playing time at MLB. Outside, at the moment we've got Roddrick Muckelroy and Keenan Robinson as "players" (i.e., RRS-level talents) and Sergio Kindle (a potential star if healthy and focused) in the hybrid role of OLB/DE. Overall, this unit could be much improved.

(2) CB - reportedly, five players are in the running here for substantive playing time: Ryan Palmer and Deon Beasley are the probable starters, and Chykie Brown and (surprise) Aaron Williams are the probable backups ... plus, Curtis Brown is in the mix. There is some outstanding athletic ability (and football speed) in that group ... and, of course, Palmer & Beasley have some experience ... but it's Chykie Brown and Aaron Williams who have similar athleticism and also possess the physical size. Whatever, it helps to have Duane Akina back in a coaching situation where he can focus his energy solely on the secondary, and it's a better than 50/50 proposition, imo, that the 2008 Horns are going to be more than alright at cornerback.

(1) Safety - as Hamlet would say: here's the rub. As things stand right now, the 2008 Horns' situation at safety appears to be the weakest link in our armor. That's not necessarily bad news, because the player talent appears to be there to rectify the situation ... but who among us can pretend that it makes no difference whether your starting safeties have any experience? Until we see Earl Thomas and (this is just a guess) Christian Scott deal with adversity this Fall, there is no way to know in advance how they are going to react ... but lord knows they have talent, and they've got both Muschamp and Akina (not to mention Mack) focusing on their learning curve. The surprise player here is freshman Blake Gideon (from Leander), who could supplant Scott in the starting lineup, and -- in any event -- appears likely to see action in our nickel package. Ben Wells also can help us at safety. Ishie Oduegwu is more experienced, but apparently has dealt with some nagging injury problems.

Summary: We could use some help on the (avoiding) injury front from the football gods, and we need the starting safeties to grow up overnight -- but, if healthy, the 2008 Horns could be the surprise team (in a positive way) in the Big-12 Conference -- stronger on both sides of the line of scrimmage than most of the national sports media appears to be anticipating. Maybe that's why Phil Steele, in his 2008 College Football Preview, refers to the Horns as "a dangerous Texas team" that "easily could win the Big-12 South this year".

We'll find out soon enough.

Hook 'em.
cow.gif
 
I was all set to see another post about our "one-man running game." But I've gotta say, KC, this is actually a good post.

From some of the things Mack and Greg Davis have said, it appears that Colt is looking really good running the ball right now, so that's something to consider in our running game analysis as well.
 
re: KCHorn's absence... we were about to say "Alas poor KaaCee, we knew him well, HornFans".

Good post and spot on about the positions. I agree Safety is probably the weakest link or chink as you said. We will have to accept youth for several games and hope they are solid by the RRS (RRR). Arguably our strongest link is DE or the OL. Malcolm Williams stepping up could be the most pleasant surprise coming into the season.

I am curious about Colt running more... is it in the ZR, Split Back, Power I, empty backfield or some of all of the above, including pass formations when nobody is open?
 
Great post. That's the takeaway I got from Orangebloods and Texassports. The learning curve for our safeties directly impact how complicated we can be with our coverages...not to mention that one of these guys will need to be the Quarterback of the secondary. Thomas, Gideon, Scott, Wells all have crazy talent though and I am excited as h-e-double hockey sticks to see these guys take the field.

I think we have the potential to be a national top 20 unit by season's end...Which would be saying a lot in our quarterback rich conference.
 
13. Less flagrant personal fouls/late hits. It is impossible for Killebrew to be responsible for 15 yard personal fouls when not being on the active roster/on campus/in the 512 area code.
 
Four National Championships and working on FIVE!

Way to go KCEEEE

I like the breakdown on our colossal inventory of talent, coaching and that fresh injection of "WANT TO".

If Humphrey and Randall start to come in as true freshman, that DT spot won't look so thin.

I hope the Fozzy injury will not affect him in two weeks. We need his speed and shifty hips.

Hated to see Josh Marshall get hurt but I have a good feeling that the group of Irby, Uhllman, Harris and Smith will step up and realize that we need someone to make a difference in that position.

Go Horns in '08.
 
Seems like earlier this year....folks were high on Brandon Collins. Not hearing about him too much lately.

I would add one more thing to the list.

Special Teams.....what is your take on this, kc?
 
Good write up, the safety situation really intrigues me too. I hope we can get some good production from Scott, I have high hopes for him (in the years to come). Gideon will be fun to watch, and Thomas sounds exciting.
 
Good post.

I think injuries and turnover margin will play huge in this season. Those 2 areas were what really hurt UT last year and I am optimistic that both will be much improved this year. Having a RB that doesn't fumble as often plus Colt throwing less INT's then add in more turnovers forced by the defense. Injuries to Orakpo, Sweed, Shipley (early), Ulatoski (early), Hills (late), etc all caused problems. Just can't lose as many key guys this year.

9. Hearing great things about the OL. They are a top 5, key backups at each of the positions, and have crosstrained Hall, Burnette, Snow, Moore, Smith to allow flexibility if needed. I had read that Tanner was the starting LG and Huey was the primary backup at both guard positions. If Huey starts I have no problem with that though but he is easily the future for 09 and 10 at the RG position. Smith has been getting work at OT and TE and I think this has opened up some playing time for Burnette at OG as a backup if needed. I am real interested to see what Hall can do at center. I believe the base formation will be shotgun 1 RB set trips. Thus the snap from the OC to Colt will be key. I haven't seen a ton of Hall in terms of run blocking so want to see how well he pulls and pushes the pile.

8. A little worried about the depth at WR right now. I know they have plenty of guys but we haven't heard much about the 6-8 guys and we don't really konw how good they are going to be this year. I think it is going to be key to have chemistry with all of the WR's this year b/c of the clock rules they will be substituting more and more.

7. At RB it sounds like McGee is the #1 guy but Fozzy isn't far off. McGee is probably the short yardage back and CO is the 3rd down back. What I am hoping is that they don't always put CO in on 3rd down when it is say 3rd and 3 or 3rd and 4. Close enough that you need to run sometimes. CO has lost reportedly 10 lbs in offseason so I want to see if he has more explosion than he did last season.

4. DT was one a big problem but now they have swun Houston and Lewis down I am less worried. They will be a quicker more effective pass rushing group that will match up well against the spread pass heavy offenses that UT plays this year. They may encounter some problems with teams like OU that can just lineup and run the ball down your throat when they want to. In those situations we may see Orakpo, Miller, Alexander, Lewis vs. Orakpo, Miller, Houston, Melton.

3. I hope Bobino make some plays this year. He is a great tackler but he wasn't an effective blitzer last year and I can't recall many plays he made dropping back in coverage. But he offers experience and that senior leadership where he can call plays while the safeties are still learning. I hope to see alot of Norton this year, especially on 3rd and long.

2. Aaron Williams is going to be a great player. I think we see him in a role like Michael Griffin his frosh season. He will play nickel and dime packages as well as special teams. He may get in some at CB in a 4-3 especially if injuries pop up.
 
My primary indicator is if we come to a 3rd and one situation and I'm unable to predict the play 90% of the time.
 
Appreciate the help with this discussion.


(1) cochamps - that's a good point regarding the Horns' secondary.

My guess is that Muschamp and Akina will have the secondary ready to go in the 2008 Horns' season opener. It seems inevitable that the new safeties are bound -- as human beings -- to make some mistakes due to their inexperience at the intercollegiate level of competition ... but they've got the ability to get the job done, and we have five games to get ready for Oklahoma on October 11.


(2) WorsterMan and formermav43 - you are right, imo, about the critical factor for the 2008 Horns of Colt running the football (regardless of the offensive set we're utilizing or the opponent that we're facing).

There are, imo, at least three key aspects to that factor this season: (a) the obvious reality that when Colt did "not" run with the football this past season -- i.e., in our losses to KState, Oklahoma and A&M -- we suffered the consequences, (b) the fact that when Colt declines to run with the football (e.g., A&M and Oklahoma), our running game tends to evaporate, while our overall offensive strategy is reduced to desperation passing plays as the Aggies and the Sooners -- with no fear of our running game -- are left free to concentrate on pressuring Colt with the pass-rush, and (c) the more subtle reality that when our offense is reduced to nothing more than the passing game (vs. the Big Dogs), we seem to lack for leadership and morale on that side of the line of scrimmage (e.g., the A&M game during each of the past two seasons).

So, let's hope that when Mack & Greg say Colt is going to run with the football this time around, they are including the RRS (not to mention the Aggies) in their thoughts ... and don't intend to drop the plan when we play tough teams.


(3) baoklhorn - always good to hear from you, and glad to see the reports that Fozzy appears to be alright in reference to the knee-injury issue. That certainly helps the RB picture -- although, imo, the running-game "scheme" is the real issue there for the 2008 Horns.


(4) StringfelloHorn - those are good points.

Brandon Collins still is doing a good job -- he and James Kirkendoll would appear to be the front-line reserves behind Jordan and Quan. We should be fine there -- the critical issue at WR arguably is SE, where we need a downfield receiver with more physical size (e.g., Malcolm Williams or Dan Buckner) than Jordan, Quan, James or Brandon possess.

As for Special Teams, my guess is that the 2008 Horns will be strong in this department -- with good coverage, effective returns (Quan -- and maybe Jordan, DeSean Hales, Malcolm Williams or D. J. Monroe ... or even, forgive the random thought, Brock Fitzhenry). Ryan Bailey, Hunter Lawrence and freshman Justin Tucker all can help with the place-kicking, and Tucker and walk-on John Gold are getting good reports from practice with the punting.


(5) Statalyzer - the Tebow (backup QB)/McFadden (backup RB)/Harvin (backup WR) analogy for John Chiles is offered in principle, not to suggest that he duplicates the precise skills of any of those three players.

Mack, from the practice reports, appears to have a more favorable view of John's progress and importance at QB than some of the Chiles detractors (who may have missed seeing John in action at QB during the 2007 Holiday Bowl) ... and anyone who thinks that John Chiles (6-2, 215, 4.4) cannot run the football effectively and must, therefore, be moved exclusively to WR -- however illogical that thinking may be -- could be in for a surprise this Fall.

Hopefully, it will be the Sooners who are surprised on October 11.

We'll see what happens down the road.

Hook 'em.
cow.gif
 
I think the best break going the Horns way this year is the limited amount of hype being given this team. Let them do their thing, under the radar if need be.
 
Amen, dgnr8 - appreciate your observations and believe the 2008 Horns (if healthy) could surprise just about everyone -- including the Sooners -- this Fall.

None of the preseason prognosticators in the national sports media (to my knowledge) have figured into their evaluations of this year's UT football team the possible positive impact from players such as John Chiles, Malcolm Williams, Kyle Hix, Michael Huey, Lamarr Houston, Sam Acho, Keenan Robinson, Aaron Williams, Earl Thomas and Christian Scott ... and the same pundits have pretty much written off Eddie Jones, Henry Melton and Sergio Kindle -- while under-estimating Colt McCoy and Rashad Bobino/Jared Norton.

It's a ready-made situation (imo) for the Horns to exceed expectations.

Orangebloods recently offered their own preseason Top-25, and they have Texas ranked No. 12 on the list ... but, as Ketch observed:

"If I knew for sure what this offense (for the 2008 Horns) was going to look like, I might have them (Texas) higher."

We're all waiting to see if Mack & Greg (perhaps with some help from Major) will do anything to diversify our running game -- and show the same brand of aggressive and creative coaching on offense that we seem to expect automatically from Will Muschamp on defense.

We already believe Muschamp will deliver, but no one is likely to believe -- after ten years of futility at UNC & Texas with his passing QBs and one-man running game -- that Greg Davis will provide any aggressive and creative coaching on the offensive side (to make the Texas running game less predictable and more effective vs. the Big Dogs) until we see it on the football field.

The proof, with GD, is in the pudding ...

... and the pudding is served in Dallas on October 11.

Hook 'em.
cow.gif
 
I think the very talented but unexperienced safeties will give us a very physical and exciting defense to watch, but I am afraid that we will also see at least a few big plays going the wrong way every game from mental errors.

I see the lack of an experienced blocking TE really affecting our running game, especially for Fozzy who is more effective running the ball outside.
 
TWC and gkp - your concerns are warranted, as far as they go.

No team's situation is perfect, but -- just to cite your own examples -- Blaine Irby now has a year's experience at TE, and Peter Ullman is a fifth-year senior TE who is an effective blocker at that playing position ... and while (from gkp's "the-glass-is-mostly-empty" perspective) we haven't heard reports on Paine and Webber at WR, we have heard reports on Quan, Jordan, Williams, Buckner, Kirkendoll and Collins -- and someone has to make the two-deep roster at WR, which only has room for six players.

We all want to beat Oklahoma and A&M this year ... and maybe the 2008 Horns will do just that.

The current UT players doubtless feel the same way, and there's this "X Factor" to consider this year -- not just what Mack & Greg (and Major) are going to do with Chiles (and it's almost logically impossible "not" to get John Chiles substantively involved in this year's offense) ... but also instead of doubting GD's ability to change his spots (with a little help from Major Applewhite), let's think positively and consider what happens if it turns out that the following "new" or rejuvenated offensive players really help the 2008 Horns' cause:

John Chiles
Michael Huey
Kyle Hix
Malcolm Williams
Fozzy Whittaker
Cody Johnson (at 255 pounds, a Melton clone with the mindset of a RB)

Plus, on offense:

Colt McCoy (back in form)
Vondrell McGee
Jordan Shipley (finally, an injury-free season)
Quan Cosby (now a "real" veteran)
Adam Ulatoski (injury-free)
Cedric Dockery (injury-free)
Blaine Irby (with some experience), and
Chris Hall (now an experienced center)

This is all very much within the realm of possibility for the 2008 Horns ... and that would give Texas arguably the strongest and most explosive offense in the Big-12 Conference. Missouri, for example, is not close (imo) to being that talented, overall, on offense.

Then, on defense:

Henry Melton (same blue-chip talent with the mindset of a DE)
Eddie Jones
Sergio Kindle
Lamaar Houston
Roddrick Muckelroy
Jared Norton
Roy Miller
Brian Orakpo

Give us those guys injury-free and more experienced, under Muschamp's direction -- are you kidding? Who else has player-talent of that caliber on defense?

Plus, defensively:

Aaron Lewis (healthy)
Sam Acho
Rashad Bobino (as a senior leader), and
Keenan Robinson ...

... and we're not even to the secondary yet. Missouri, for example, would kill for player-talent of that caliber, and right now -- the 2008 Horns actually have it.

Then we have Duane Akina (arguably the best secondary coach in major-college football) fully focused on the task at hand, with help from Muschamp and Mack ... and they're working with (at least) these ten players:

Christian Scott
Deon Beasley
Earl Thomas
Chykie Brown
Aaron Williams
Curtis Brown
Ryan Palmer
Ben Wells
Blake Gideon
Ishie Oduegwu

Don't throw me in the briar patch.

The 2008 Horns could be formidable.

Hook 'em.
cow.gif
 
I never said you were incorrect, just that you haven't witnessed firsthand that on which you report. Would that it were all true. Plus I believe that I am more optimistic than yourself when it comes to the "one-back running game." The ability of the blockers to move their assignments out of the way and the ability of the RBs to see the creases will be much improved this season over last.

My glass is not "half-empty," even as we speak!
smile.gif
 
Thanks, gkp - that sounds like the right glass.

The 2008 Horns have a chance -- if we can develop the team chemistry we're looking for on offense -- to beat Oklahoma and be the Big-12 South Division champions this Fall. From there, anything is possible.

If we can work up as much fervor to show Stoops we mean business on October 11, as we apparently can to show Schnellenberger the same thing on August 30 ...

... everyone's glass (in the Horns' camp) could be filled by the end of the 2008 football season.

We'll see what happens.

Hook 'em.
cow.gif
 
gkp - this is in reference to your point about the 2008 Horns' "one-man" running-game scheme -- with a passing QB.

We all (at least in the Texas camp) like Colt McCoy, and my own perspective on the 2008 Horns' QB situation is affected -- in terms of any negative implications -- far more by the offensive coaching philosophy of Mack & Greg than by the ability of Colt.

In one of his recent press conferences, Mack made an observation regarding Colt that he (McCoy) is faster than some folks think -- maybe a 4.5 in the 40 -- and a better runner with the football than he is given credit for ... based on the actual rushing stats from the Horns' 2007 football season. What Mack forgot to mention (and it's difficult to know whether he's just trying to fool us, or is actually fooling himself) is that those 2007 rushing stats may look good overall, but they also document the fact that in the Horns' losses to KState, Oklahoma and A&M ... Colt rushed for a total of 13 yards and an average of .7 (seven-tenths) of a yard-per-carry in those three games, combined. That's an average of four (4) total rushing yards-per-game from Colt when all the chips were on the table. Against Oklahoma, Colt's total was minus-24 yards rushing.

In other words, it doesn't matter whether Colt McCoy can run effectively with the football -- if he doesn't do it vs. the Big Dogs, when the Horns most need Colt's running ability to win the football game.

Mack & Greg now have a consecutive ten-year stretch (their last two seasons together at North Carolina and eight straight seasons at Texas) utilizing an offensive philosophy -- with a passing QB -- that features a totally-predictable "one-man" running-game scheme ... which invariably fails, each year, vs. the Big Dogs. As a result, the offense is left up in the air, so to speak, with no viable ground game when we most need to run the football (against our toughest opponents), and, coincidentally, Mack & Greg never have coached a football team in their entire intercollegiate coaching careers (spanning three decades) that could win a Conference title or a BCS-level postseason game with that offensive philosophy.

Even so, they steadfastly have refused (so far) to do anything to fix the running-game "scheme" problem that always has existed when they utilize a passing QB (who does not run with the football vs. the Big Dogs). Mack now has hired five (5) Defensive Coordinators at Texas, while GD just sits there in perpetuity as our Offensive Coordinator -- making exactly the same mistake, year after year, with our totally-predictable "one-man" running-game scheme -- like some kind of perennial poisonous flower that "blooms" each Fall in the Horns' backyard and eventually takes over enough of the rest of the garden to keep it from winning a prize.

To borrow the wonderful thought from "The Shawshank Redemption" -- "I guess it comes down to a simple choice, really. You either get busy living, or you get busy dying."

Either let Colt run with the football vs. Oklahoma, or modify our proven-to-be-fatal (to us) "one-man" running-game scheme to create at least a modicum of misdirection and unpredictability in some other way -- e.g., with John Chiles in a combination Tebow/McFadden/Harvin role.

Just do something other than conceding the game to the Sooners before we arrive in Dallas on October 11.

Hook 'em.
cow.gif
 
Awww, KC you had to go and do it anyway. The only thing missing is "in this millennium", which you seem to have replaced with" vs. the Big Dogs" as your new catch phrase. The whole "passing QB" complaint is just old now.

The first post was, at least, interesting. Now you're just back-sliding.

Davis has said that his base O is still shotgun-one back, trips. But that does not preclude him from using ace, I, jumbo, 4-wide, 5-wide, or pro set. Frankly, if the back-up QB can't pass all that well, I'd be reluctant to call my 1st stringer's number too often.
 
gkp - that's all good ... for the Horns' passing game.

But then you're left with the undisputed fact that Texas -- in its past five games in the RRS with a passing QB -- is averaging 1.87 yards-per-carry running the football vs. Oklahoma.

You can ignore the problem, but that arguably is conceding the game to Oklahoma before it starts.

It seems fair to suggest that if you believe nothing should be done to fix the Horns' running-game scheme with a passing QB ... then you presumably are satisfied with the Horns' performance on the ground (in the past five games with a passing QB) vs. Oklahoma. If Mack & Greg (and Major) share that view and do nothing to change the Horns' running-game scheme this time around, and we see the same negative results in the RRS as before ...

... will you say the same thing next year?

If so, how long would you give GD to come up with a viable running game at Texas (with a passing QB) vs. the Big Dogs? Are you content, based on GD's documented past history with passing QBs, to finish each season for the foreseeable future with no Conference title or BCS-level postseason game?

Claiming that there is no problem with the Horns' running-game scheme (and that it's "back-sliding" to document the problem) is not likely to help us beat Oklahoma.

Hook 'em.
cow.gif
 
I fear that the current flavor of college football is heading away from offenses that feature the run. Maybe the issue is not that we are missing runners on the field as much as we are missing elite throwers and catchers. Sure, our 2005 season happened in large part because of a very gifted mobile quarterback, but the truth is we can't feature that kind of player regularly (maybe ever again). Had we won just one more game in 2001 and lost one more in 2005 we would be talking about how fantastic pro-style qb's are right now.

Regardless of how much I hate them, Texas Tech has a pretty freaky offense. Fortunately for the rest of the NCAA their defense has been equally as bad. Imagine what we could do with our far superior players with an offense like that. I'm not saying I would want it that way, but it is still fun to stir the mind once in a while.

As a disclaimer I would like to add that in theory I would DEFINITELY prefer as many multiple skilled players on the field as possible, but the reality of it is that passing is a very effective way of getting yards and scoring points.
 
TWC- Go to the head of the class. But KC will ignore you. You have not solved his problem by successfully recruiting Russell Shepard.
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top