Saw 'Super 8'......

FAST FRED

500+ Posts
.....and I enjoyed it.

The Link

SPOILERS AHEAD!!!!!!










Remembering quite fondly the good (and bad) sci fi movies I saw back in the day, I don't think newer movies such as "Cloverfield" or "District 9" measure up well to most of them.

I've decided that I just wasn't in the target audience for these recent creature features or for such modern frightening film fare as "The Blair Witch Project," "The Cave" or the "Paranormal Activity" trilogy,

That must be the new wave and, unapologetic, I guess I'm more old school as far as horror flicks go.

Yeah, I flinched when I was supposed to flinch in all those newer flicks, but I left the theater unflinchingly wondering why did those movie makers or I bother?

I found Keanu Reeves portraying the "man from outer space who made the earth stand still" to be painfully accurate type-casting in that misguided redo and the last King Kong flick, despite all its exciting CGI action, slipped over too often (IMO) into Fantasyland from its rightful and proper place in Adventureland.

IMHO, "The Mist," with it's suspenseful story, attention to casting and character development, decent special effects and surprising twist at the end was, until now, the most satisfying scary movie that I'd seen in a while.

I enjoyed that Stephen King story adaptation.

But I thought that "Super 8" had more to offer and was even better entertainment, for me.

smile.gif


It's a mash up of classic, "so bad it's good," sci fi like 1953's "Invaders From Mars" or 1954's "Them!" with later sci fi excellence like "Alien," interspersed with sci fi humor a la "Mars Attacks," mixed with well-acted, poignant, coming of age plot points that recall "Stand By Me," but wherein a stranded alien is no longer curious, as was cute little "E.T.:The Extra-Terrestrial," but rather well-past the friendly phone home stage and is desperately wanting to slip the surly bonds of Earth.

I quickly became immersed in the vibe of this movie, jumped at all the scary parts, smiled at the humor, enjoyed the nostalgia, appreciated the cleverness, recognized the satire, liked the attention to detail and construction of this movie within a movie and dug all the homage given other films and to the sci fi genre, which has immensely interested and frighteningly pleasured me through the years.

So, this was a fast-moving, fun trip down Monster Movie Memory Lane for me and my freely given suspension of disbelief was as well-rewarded this time as back when I was a kid watching 1953's "The War of the Worlds," 1956's "Forbidden Planet" or "The Invasion of the Body Snatchers" and 1951's "The Thing from Another World" or it's remake in 1982, "The Thing."

Or 1951's understated, cogent "The Day the Earth Stood Still."

In fact, I believe the more experience you have watching sci fi, especially if you like the classic stuff, the more you'll enjoy this movie.

smile.gif


Your thoughts??
 
I enjoyed it. It was like if E.T. had a bigger, meaner, scarier brother, or if the Cloverfield monster had a smaller, weaker, nicer brother.
 
I guess the ad campaign lured me into seeing it. All in all, I enjoyed it.

One thing that annoyed me was that you never got a clear look at the alien. He was a constant blur of motion. But that seems to be typical of CGI.
 
Definitely enjoyed it, and definitely liked that we got to see the actual movie at the end. And it was fun being able to go in without knowing a lot about the story ahead of time. I really don't like how trailers now pretty much tell you half the plot before you ever watch the movie. I have always thought it would be great to experience a movie like the first Psycho audience - no idea what the movie is, going right along and then BANG, movie completely changed course.

Spoiler....







One thing I was disappointed in was that it fell back on the "mistreated alien who just wants to go home" theme. I thought some of the military aspects of the movie just seemed formulaic.

The kids were hilarious - for some reason I kept getting flashback to The Goonies.

One thing I thought the writers did really well was that they handled backstory very well. One of my pet peeves is when movies tell us back story by having characters go off on these heavy-handed dialogues where they recount events in a way that no one in real life ever does. "Johnny, you know that if I could take it back, I never would have pulled that lever that released the gas and killed all those people"... I like that in this case, they never forced a revelation on what happened in the accident, because why would anyone need to recount it? All the characters knew what happened. The scene with the sheriff and whatshisname where he just said "it was an accident, I'm sorry and I never meant to hurt those people" was all anyone would ever really say, and it ended up being a really powerful scene.
 
Thanks.

I hate when they do that. It's like having to plow through all the advertising before you can see the film clip you want to see on Yahoo.

I think it was The Heartbreak Kid that had a hilarious scene half way through the credits. I just happened to see it because I was to lazy to turn off the blu-ray.
 
Great movie! It was great having a movie that's supposed to be a sci-fi flick really be about the kids.

The bonus material wasn't after all the credits roll but just a little bit through them, as credits roll next to the mini movie.

Oh ... and this Fanning sister doesn't annoy the piss out of me.
 
I usually have mainstream tastes… I like having mainstream tastes… I found the film slow and derivative.

The movie took 30 mins too long to get the protagonist active in the main plot. I’ll give an example of the movie being too slow for me. The scene where the young girl pretends to be a zombie in a cute romantic episode with the protagonist dragged out too long. I thought the entire first act was too long.

I found some things unbelievably convenient. It was too convenient that the biology professor survived (how the hell?), was the kid’s middle school teacher, saved all his important classified documents at the school, the kids somehow figured they were there, the kids could easily break in. It was very convenient of the alien to let the girl down at the end for the boy to save JUST as the fireworks are going off after the derivative “OH MY GOD THE LIGHTER DOESN’T WORK”. I could go on.

I hope I’m not becoming a cynical movie snob. God don’t let that happen to me.
 
The movie is a fond remembrance of movies from the 80s which I didn't much like back then. I was sort of at the spot Gadfly is now back then.

I don't think it's snobbery, it's just that the formulas lose their freshness as you see them over and over. Viewers new to the formulas naturally enjoy them more.

Spielberg, who is being referenced in this movie, was always too sweet for me although he has great skills as a filmmaker. If you weren't in love with the original work, a fond remembrance of them doesn't do much for you.

I didn't feel the ticket price was a waste of money, but it was close.
 
I kind of got the feeling that the formulaic part was sort of the point. Let's take a look back at a classic formula horror movie, and imagine if you are on the outside looking in. I kind of took the escaped scientist and some of the other cliches as sort of a nod to that.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top