.... and greatly enjoyed it.
The Link
I rented this movie from NETFLIX and thought it had a good story, interesting characters, great western sets and scenery, good actors well-cast, believable action and good pace.
I thought it was fine movie making when I first viewed it.
Then I watched it again, listening to Ed Harris' commentary about what he was trying to do and show as the writer, director and lead actor and saw the deleted scenes and heard why he deleted them, and I became even further convinced that he, his cast and crew made a very good Western movie.
The characters are nuanced and believable and I think it compares well, at least at some times, with such as "Open Range," "Unforgiven," "Dances with Wolves," "The Outlaw Josey Wales," "Shane", "The 3:10 to Yuma," John Ford's great films, any of the OK Corral flicks and other oaters which are often remembered and mentioned when folks list their favorites from that genre.
You might not rate it so high as all that, but I'll predict most fans of those movies should enjoy this one.
I think it's worth a rental, if you missed it in theaters as I did.
Ed Harris plays a strong, flawed anti-hero; Viggo Mortensen, who narrates, is more intelligent and socially adept, but steadfastly supports Harris; Renee Zellweger is very believable as a rather plain looking widow whose ability to make use of any situation to survive and thrive is her most striking feature; and Jeremy Irons, in his first Western role, plays a delicious villain.
It's a little like "Deadwood," but the scenes are less cluttered with wh*res, c*cksuckers, Chinamen, gold miners and iambic pentameter.
Still, the script is quite literate without as much speechifying or using multiple curse words in compound/complex sentences.
I was pleasantly reminded of "High Noon," "My Darling Clementine," "One-Eyed Jacks" and "The Big Country," seeing well-drawn, multi-layered characters in an excellent Western screenplay.
And I thought the storyline bore favorable comparison to "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance," but this flick makes more and better use of outdoor Western scenery.
Plus, the vocal and unspoken interplay between Harris' and Mortensen's characters made me fondly recall Henry Fonda and Jimmy Stewart interacting in "The Cheyenne Social Club."
"The men were believable and the women were believable too" was a comment from my wife.
She liked it also.
This movie set up, played and unfolded nicely for my tastes and sensibilities as a longtime fan of the genre.
I thought it was a very good film and an even better Western.
It reminded me of a more realistic "Gunsmoke," wherein the drama was heightened because you aren't sure all the main characters, who've earned your interest, are always gonna live to appear in next week's episode.
The Link
I rented this movie from NETFLIX and thought it had a good story, interesting characters, great western sets and scenery, good actors well-cast, believable action and good pace.
I thought it was fine movie making when I first viewed it.
Then I watched it again, listening to Ed Harris' commentary about what he was trying to do and show as the writer, director and lead actor and saw the deleted scenes and heard why he deleted them, and I became even further convinced that he, his cast and crew made a very good Western movie.
The characters are nuanced and believable and I think it compares well, at least at some times, with such as "Open Range," "Unforgiven," "Dances with Wolves," "The Outlaw Josey Wales," "Shane", "The 3:10 to Yuma," John Ford's great films, any of the OK Corral flicks and other oaters which are often remembered and mentioned when folks list their favorites from that genre.
You might not rate it so high as all that, but I'll predict most fans of those movies should enjoy this one.
I think it's worth a rental, if you missed it in theaters as I did.
Ed Harris plays a strong, flawed anti-hero; Viggo Mortensen, who narrates, is more intelligent and socially adept, but steadfastly supports Harris; Renee Zellweger is very believable as a rather plain looking widow whose ability to make use of any situation to survive and thrive is her most striking feature; and Jeremy Irons, in his first Western role, plays a delicious villain.
It's a little like "Deadwood," but the scenes are less cluttered with wh*res, c*cksuckers, Chinamen, gold miners and iambic pentameter.
Still, the script is quite literate without as much speechifying or using multiple curse words in compound/complex sentences.
I was pleasantly reminded of "High Noon," "My Darling Clementine," "One-Eyed Jacks" and "The Big Country," seeing well-drawn, multi-layered characters in an excellent Western screenplay.
And I thought the storyline bore favorable comparison to "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance," but this flick makes more and better use of outdoor Western scenery.
Plus, the vocal and unspoken interplay between Harris' and Mortensen's characters made me fondly recall Henry Fonda and Jimmy Stewart interacting in "The Cheyenne Social Club."
"The men were believable and the women were believable too" was a comment from my wife.
She liked it also.
This movie set up, played and unfolded nicely for my tastes and sensibilities as a longtime fan of the genre.
I thought it was a very good film and an even better Western.
It reminded me of a more realistic "Gunsmoke," wherein the drama was heightened because you aren't sure all the main characters, who've earned your interest, are always gonna live to appear in next week's episode.