Saw '127 Hours'......

FAST FRED

500+ Posts
....and thought it was good entertainment and very good movie making.

The Link

I liked it much more than "Grizzly Man" or that flick about those two scuba divers mistakenly being left behind with all the sharks when their dive boat captain failed to count heads before heading home.

However, I didn't like it as much as some other survival movie stories I've seen, like Burt Reynolds' "Deliverance" or Richard Harris' "Man in the Wilderness."

Director Danny Boyle masterfully uses every new and old cinematic technique in the book to interestingly tell this true story and successfully gives viewers the unique perspective of being pinned by a fallen boulder in a rocky crevasse about the size of a closet, isolated and all alone in the immense vastness of Utah's canyonlands.

Creative camera angles with mostly unrepeated multiple views, really good editing, flashbacks and hopeful dreams about the future all prevented movie monotony from being a problem.

And James Franco's fine portrayal is interesting, revealing, nuanced, brave, resourceful, measured and even humorous.

He's nominated for Best Actor, but this flick is really more of a showcase for director Boyle so I don't feel Franco will win the acting academy award.

And the movie's resolution is not done as well as the buildup and climax, IMHO, so I don't foresee a Best Picture or Best Director victory either.

Heck, since the outcome, even though amazing, courageous and uplifting, is already so generally well known, unlike the ending of "Slumdog Millionaire," there was little suspense about what's going to happen.

The suspense was more about how Boyle and Franco were going to show it.

The storyline, location and and everything else is covered so thoroughly that I think this is a movie that, while definitely good, probably only warrants a single viewing for most folks.

For me, it certainly was well worth the $5 for my one viewing, but I know that's all I'll require.

The story was already so well publicized that, even though this film about it is very well done, I found my emotional payoff came when I first heard the breaking news about the ordeal and survival and not when I saw the motion picture.

So, in the theater, I enjoyed observing the technical excellence of the movie making more than seeing this interesting, emotional story brought to life.

JMO.

smile.gif
 
Correct, GemStateJim.

I was simply comparing movies about survival in the wild.

And my point was that the interesting approach which Danny Boyle used in making "127 Hours" worked better for me than either the straight forward documentation of "Grizzly Man" or the more dramatized, but not particularly cinematically innovative, storytelling format of the diver/shark movie.

Sorry you were confused.

cool.gif
 
I feel you are being dogmatically negative about accepting my explanation, but that's your right and privilege.

smile.gif


You misunderstood my meaning and don't wish to allow my comparison of movies which I found somewhat related in subject matter.

I think you are saying they couldn't/shouldn't be compared in any way.

I disagree.

I didn't compare them as documentaries; I compared them only to the point of saying that I enjoyed one movie about happenings in the wild more than another.

smile.gif


And I believe I could compare those basketball movies, however superficially, in the exact, same way that I compared "Grizzly Man" with "127 Hours," by simply saying which of the roundball flicks you mentioned that I liked better.

I certainly would be able to do that.

smile.gif


And I didn't say "Grizzly Man" was totally or even mainly about survival in the wild.

However, the bear survived their encounter and the naturalist didn't, so survival in the wild was covered de facto to that extent, notwithstanding that the movie's main theme certainly was something else.

smile.gif


I come here for intelligent, courteous discussion and you have indeed provided that.

I've understood your points and I've explained mine.

Thank you.

cool.gif
 
Jim, I think there are some threads over on Swap Meet or Prayer Requests that haven't been **** on yet if you'd like to make your way over there later.
 
rolleyes.gif

Fred gave his opinion on the MOVIE. You don't do anything but troll the boards looking for ways to correct people, and it got a little bit tiring seeing your random, mean-spirited, interjections pop up on 6-7 threads last night. Your "casual observations" make you sound like a world class a-hole, and your constant need to put other people down for their opinions begs the question of whether you were held enough as a child.

No one wants to hear your review of Fred's review. If you want to write your own review of 127 Hours, then by all means, knock yourself out. Include as many self-aggrandizing literary references as you want, everyone will be super impressed by your internet prowess.

Fred, thanks for the review, I was wondering how already being aware of the story was going to change my opinion of the movie. I plan on seeing it tonight.
 
Fred seems like a pretty good guy and I'm sure most of us really appreciate his input on the movies he sees..I know I do.

I don't believe I have ever known anyone that actually goes to theaters to see as many movies as he does, especially in this age of Netflix, Blue ray, streaming videos, etc. Hopefully he goes to the discount matinees and brings his own snacks.
smile.gif
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top