Roth IRAs/401ks

hornpharmd

5,000+ Posts
At this point it is clear that our government is going to be running large deficits at least for the next 10 years. Both candidates have plans to draw down the deficit. President Obama's plan requires a large sustained GDP growth that just isn't likely to happen based on past growth #s. It will include a small tax bump for the middle class but this should be expected as increased revenue is going to be needed. Only problem there is that since that GDP growth likely won't happen then we are going to either going to need to make much steeper spending cuts than currently planned or taxes will need to go up further. The Romney plans sounds great but without all of the specifics it is impossible to run the #s and tell what the future impact will be. Certainly President Obama has tried to get things done through Congress in terms of spending cuts and tax increases but has been unsuccessful. This is a big reason his deficits continue to be so high. Will Romney be any more successful in getting his agenda passed if he is elected? Point is, that either way it is looking like these large deficits are going to be continue for at least the next decade. They may go down to say 1/2 TRillion/year but that is still a very large deficit. We can all be optimistic about change coming but I am taking a more realistic view to what I see happening over at least the next decade.

So with that backdrop, my discussion point is this:

How will Roth 401ks and IRAs affect tax revenue in the future and how will this affect the deficits? The trend has been for people to put more and more money every year into after tax accounts. Financial advisors are predicting higher tax rates for all in the future in order to fund all of this spending. Thus even though we may be paying 20-30% effective tax rate for the middle class, that could easily be a 30-40% tax rate in a decade or two. And what about in 20-30 years when many of us will actually be retiring. We will have a great tax advantage in the long term by paying the taxes now and getting the money tax free later in life. The problem I see is that our government is taking that tax money now and running large deficits. What are they going to do in the future when they aren't getting that tax money? Seems like a poorly designed system to me. Starting to get the feeling it could cause the same problem that pensions are causing now in many states.

Thoughts?
 
Obligatory Roth IRA can't tackle to save its' life.
However, 401k usually performs horribly in the red zone, so.....
 
So...where is the tie-in to Deloss Dodds and Mack Brown? I'm sure they fit into this discussion somewhere.
biggrin.gif
 
I don't think it will necessarily effect things that much with things staying as they are.

First, it's great to have a tax break, but if i can't spare the money to put it in retirement funds, it's irrelevant. Right now there's no sign that middle class people have the flexibility to divert more money into retirement. In theory, the whole point of a roth IRA is to avoid future taxes, so really, I don't think anyone is going to think about it any differently than they do now. I would say that the motivation to save on taxes is there now anyway, so I don't think it would cause people to invest more than they normally would. As for it hurting tax revenue in the future, it's possible, but I think trying to discourage it would do much more harm to the economy than any potentially "losses" in revenue (and by losses, I mean "opportunities to take more money from taxpayers." I don't subscribe to the idea that the government has first right of refusal on my paycheck.)
 
My philosophy is to try and max out the return of my employer match in my 401k. My employer matches 50 cents of each dollar you put in, up to 13%. I'm contributing 10% right now. I used to invest the full $4k a year into my Roth as well, but once my wife lost her job, we stopped that. We're paying off her student loan, and may take a few years to do that, but once that's done, I plan to take advantage of the full 13% at work, and every dollar after that that I put into retirement, is going into a Roth.

i know our retarded government is going to find a way to define me as a high bracket income earner due to my retirement accounts.
 
Now that you're on the correct board. Obama has no plan. The best we have to tell about his plan is the past four years. No one wants another four years like the last four Obama years.

Luckily we aren't going to have that burden placed on us again.
 
Hey Bay, one thing I'm not clear on. As I understand it, the max annual contribution is $5k to a Roth. So what happens if you want to contribute more - is that impossible? Or does it just change the tax implications? If you wanted to do more than $5k annually could you open up a seperate IRA?
 
i was going to post something, but i had to go verify something. did they reduce the $5k per person if you're married? is the limit not still 10000, married filing jointly, if you make less than $170k something?
 
Suddenly, it sounds like you are thinking like a Republican. The same thing happens to small business when the democrats talk about raising capital gains taxes. If you invest in a small business, you are subject to capital gains tax when you sell. If Obama is re-elected, many small businesses will cash out to avoid the proposed taxes.

Politics aside, great point on the retirement fund issue. If you cash early though, you are subject to a 10% penalty as well.
 
This is what I'm afraid of...

I'm doing my duty - planning ahead. I started saving for retirement when I was 21 years old. I give up a nicer car, and I miss a lot of vacations to do this. I have friends who are doing the opposite. I'm afraid I'm being a sucker, and when we all retire, my friends will get their medical expenses paid for (rewarding them) while I'll be expected to use my life savings. As you know, a life savings will get chewed up quick with one hospital stay.

You guys have any thoughts on that? I don't want to be counted as "rich" just because I sacrificed to save my entire life.
 
I think if BHO gets re-elected the Government will look into "confiscating" retirement accounts and to eliminate the deficit and some of the debt. They will "Social Securitize" those accounts giving the owner/sucker a "reasonable ROR" in the Social Security rate like 2-4%. Don't laugh they have thought about this.

In reply to:


 
i am laughing a bit. only change in the next 4 years may be to increase the retirement age by 2 years. and if they did that they would give an exception for those already within 5-10 years of retirement.

good point from previos posters. generation Y often is considered to start in 1982. so you are probably talking aboutthose in their 20's now. i am late gen X born in 78 and many people in their early 30's are still paying off college debt and not thinking 35 years ahead, but they should be. you are doing right thing gadfly. live a balanced life and you will be rewarded later in life for your sacrifices.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top