Republican Form Chart

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coelacanth
  • Start date Start date
C

Coelacanth

Guest
These are just my own thoughts on the candidates, in the order of which candidate I’m most likely to vote for at this point in the race.


1. Mitt Romney—I like his demeanor and his poise; he’s presidential; he seems like the most likely to be able to beat Obama; I wonder if he has the courage to do the austerity thing the way it needs to be done.

2. Michelle Bachmann—I found myself pulling for her the other night, and I suppose that counts for something; she sold me on the idea that she would be less likely than most of the other candidates to abandon her principles.

3. Ron Paul—The smartest guy in the race; his views on the financial situation are dead on; but strict adherence to principle may be better to suited to economics than foreign policy, where competing principles have to be prioritized; the worse the economy gets, the more likely I am to vote for Ron Paul.

4. Herman Cain—He says goofy things sometimes because he’s not a sound-bite guy; I like that, and he comes across as a guy who’s in the race for the right reasons; he’d have to do lots of on-the-job learning, but somehow I think he’d adapt quickly.

5. Rudy Giuliani—He’s a bad campaigner, but he’s an excellent public servant; I would trust him to do the right thing, though I wonder if he might not be better suited to be a war president than an economic president.

6. Sarah Palin—I like her political instincts, but I distrust her lack of knowledge about foreign policy; I wonder if she’s angling for another VP nomination.

7. Rick Santorum—I didn’t mind his ideas the other night, but his feigned outrage at Ron Paul was overdone; that’s not the way you deal with a guy like Ron Paul.

8. Rick Perry—I’ll keep an open mind, but I have the sense that he’s essentially out for his own ambition, and that his principles are more Machiavellian than conservative; and Machiavellians who serve in conservative states do their best to look conservative.

9. Newt Gingrich—He seemed out of place in the debate; a very smart guy, but he takes himself a bit too seriously; he’s trying to invoke Reagan, but for voters under 35, that’s an obscure reference.

10. John Huntsman—Who advised him to run? I mean, he may be a great guy, but his candidacy makes no sense in the current political climate; he might be able to overcome his moderate views if he looked presidential, but he doesn’t.

11. Tim Pawlenty—No.


Thoughts?
 
From an independent voter who has voted R, D, and third party candidates:

-- If Ron Paul wins the nomination, I'll vote for him.

-- There are 7 names on that list who I would NEVER vote for, including intellectual featherweights, Mitt "corporations-are people" Romney, and those who suck up to religious fanatics. If any of them are on the ticket (including VP), then I'll vote third party (I think Obama has been a horrible president).

-- A few names there who I'm not familiar enough with at this point to decide.

-- Overall, a pretty pitiful list, IMO. As I get older, either candidates are getting worse or I'm just figuring out that the average politician is a shameless self-promoter lacking in vision and conviction.
 
I don't understand why more people aren't in Romney's camp. How he lost the '08 nomination is beyond me but he would've lost to Obama anyway. Given his background he is the most qualified candidate out there to dig us out of this hole we are in fiscally.
 
As a ticket splitter, I'm not the type that chooses Republican nominees in Texas. Rommney, Huntsman and Pawlenty seem like people I could be excited to support.
Herman Cain either doesn't understand or doesn't believe inthe 1st amendment. Michelle Bachmann is nutty and Ron Paul, unfortuately, comes across that way.. Perry has a history of looking out for his friends and not the public interest. He deosn't appear to me to be intellectually capable of a lot of growth. Palin seems as shallow as Perry to me, but as a human being I think she has more potential. It's hard to overlook the good things she did in Alaska.
 
I wish Gary Johnson had some momentum. A telling sign is that the OP made no mention of him. I like what I see in him but if he cannot build a national campaign then the point is moot.
 
Wow, Mich. Great responses. A link that provides no context to where Mass was with their unemployment rate at the points when Mitt began his term/ended his term, and a link to Stephen Colbert. Laughable, and yet, entirely typical.
 
If the last two pargraphs in Giovanni Jones' post don't scare the crap out of an intelligent person, nothing will.

Anyone who posts a defence of that is a part of a real threat to America.
 
side note: If Romney underestimates Perry as a political opponent, he does so at his own peril. I have a feeling he's going to get schooled very quickly on how hard and canny a campaigner Perry is. (He would do well to have a chat or two with KBH.) I'm sure that Perry is too astute to say anything directly about Romney's LDS affiliation. But I fully expect that others in the Perry camp (or hired by them) will bring this up at every opportunity, particularly to the evangelical base in the GOP. (Were any Mormons in attendance at The Response? Doubtful, given who the organizers were.)

In reply to:


 
Do you guys wish to make the argument that Bachmann or Perry's connections to Reconstructionism are more substantial than Obama's connections to Marxism? I think that would be a difficult argument.
 
I would hold my nose and vote for Romney over Obama. If it is
Perry or bachmann I will vote third party.

I have a sneaking suspicion that perry is going to win the nomination. He knows how to say just the right thing to fire up the masses. He also has no shame and will use any tactic that is available to win. You have to remember that all of this fire breathing conservatism is coming out of the mouth of a former democrat. I'm convinced he has no beliefs - just ambition.

There are others in the field that I would vote for over Obama but I think it will come down to these three. We should all hope I'm wrong.
 

NEW: Pro Sports Forums

Cowboys, Texans, Rangers, Astros, Mavs, Rockets, etc. Pro Longhorns. The Chiefs and that Swift gal. This is the place.

Pro Sports Forums
Back
Top