Most coaches that win national championships were lazy in the first place.
Vince Young's offensive line >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 & 2009 offensive lines. Go look up Vince Young's line. They all had long pro careers except for one that decided not to play pro football. On his last run to the end zone watch how many USC players the offensive line takes out.
Vince Young was fantastic, but I have to agree that Colt McCoy was more valuable to his team than Vince Young. That true statement does not takeaway from the greatness of Vince Young. Would Colt McCoy win a national title on the 05 team? Almost certainly. Would Vince Young win a national title without that offensive line, David Thomas (can you even name 09's tight end?), Ramonce Taylor, Jamal Charles, etc? Maybe. Even the fullback from the 2005 team (Ahmad Hall) went on to play 85 games in the NFL. Vince Young is one of the greatest college players (his junior year) of all time, but it is a giant myth it was a one man show. McCoy was not a one man show, but it was pretty close. McCoy was also better all 4 seasons than Vince's first two season excluding the Michigan Rose Bowl.
Also, 30-2 included some saves by Chance Mock and some losses Vince Young was a part of but did not start for and did not get credit for.
Colt McCoy is probably the best college QB to ever play at UT. If we are considering pro careers, it is NFL Hall of Famer Bobby Layne.
I really do not like to beat up on Vince Young, but the whole "vince young did it by himself" and the rest of the team and the coaches had nothing to do with anything myth has gotten so old.
Dan Marino, for example, despite playing for the Miami Dolphins, is one of the best quarterbacks of all time and better than a lot of quarterbacks that won super bowls.