If the Austin and Ft. Worth regionals match up, I dont care much for it. Of the 8 teams, 5 are in Texas. I guess by keeping teams closer and cutting down on costs the NCAA thinks they are doing everyone a favor. Just makes no sense for the Texas teams to have to eliminate each other.
According to that projection, and I know these projections will change after this week's games, Texas will be the #1 seed, and get Binghampton, Texas State and Oregon State in Austin.
The most interesting projection is the TCU regional will get aggy, and match up with the Austin regional in a super regional. Could we be facing aggy again? That could be fun, although they might not get past a good TCU team.
In looking at other regionals and match ups for supers, you could have Kansas/Kansas State and Oklahoma/Oklahoma State and then Texas/A&M all being matched in supers if they all won their respective regionals.
Yeah, I noticed that too. I know it would be impossible to keep teams from the same conference meeting in the regionals, but this projection has too many possible conference matchups.
1. I don't think Minnesota is going to get a regional. Ohio St. ended up winning the Big Ten. I think Louisville takes it...apparently they have good facilities.
2. I think aggy goes to Rice, and the winner goes to LSU.
3. Oklahoma St. is NOT getting in this tournament. No chance.
4. I'm still not sold on us being #1. Don't think it happens.
Tim Weiser, Asst Commissioner Athletics, Big 12, is the Chairman of the NCAA selection committee this year. He was interviewed during the Kans/KState TV broadcast Sunday.
He is a KState grad and seems like a "sharp invididual" who understands the process and would try to prevent as many conference matchups as possible. He did mention that geographic considerations to reduce cost/time of travel is a factor, but I trust the committee to prevent as many conference matchups as possible for not only the Big 12, but nationally. IMO, SEBaseball is the least credible of the media services.
Okie state can get a bid the same way Arkansas did a year or so ago, when they had a losing record in the SEC and didn't make the conference tournament.
I know it's a topsy-turvy year and that no team has emerged as a dominant power, but I just don't see our 'Horns meriting a No.1 overall seed. They certainly deserve to host a super regional, but as the best team in the country?
It's the hitting. Per NCAA.com, we're 236th in the country in slugging percentage, which is DEAD LAST among the 48 contenders (I define "contenders" as the Rivals.com predicted top 3 seeds in each region).
And it's really not even close. Only 3 other teams (Mizzou, Wash St., SDSU) are below 200, and we're at least 50 spots away from the next serious contender.
We've got excellent pitching, great defense. But you have to score runs to win ballgames. Average pitchers usually shut us down. I'm very worried about what the good ones will do.