B Beau Vine 1,000+ Posts May 22, 2008 #1 Tim Redding: 57 innings, 6-3, 3.16 ERA, opponents hitting .210 against him Sidney Ponson: 39.2 innings, 3-0, 2.95 ERA (Both have better ERAs than Johan Santana.) Surely this is a sign of the apocalypse, isn't it?
Tim Redding: 57 innings, 6-3, 3.16 ERA, opponents hitting .210 against him Sidney Ponson: 39.2 innings, 3-0, 2.95 ERA (Both have better ERAs than Johan Santana.) Surely this is a sign of the apocalypse, isn't it?
U Uncle Rico 1,000+ Posts May 22, 2008 #2 The answer to your question is yes because I'm used to the Rangers letting pitchers go who then proceed to acheive greatness instead of the other way around.
The answer to your question is yes because I'm used to the Rangers letting pitchers go who then proceed to acheive greatness instead of the other way around.