Photos of Clemens @ Canseco Party

[Mr.Wizard]

The Link

Photos taken by an 11-year-old boy at the time places Roger Clemens at a party given by Jose Canseco in 1998 and would contradict the star pitcher's sworn testimony that he did not attend the event, the New York Daily News reported Friday.

Canseco has said in a sworn affidavit that Clemens was not at the party, but Clemens' former trainer Brian McNamee testified that he was there.

"We have reason to believe it's reliable evidence," Richard Emery, one of McNamee's lawyers, told the Daily News. "We believe there's photographic evidence that shows Clemens was at a party he says he wasn't at."

The Justice Department is weighing whether to investigate Clemens for perjury and taking performance-enhancing drugs. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which called Clemens and McNamee to testify earlier this month, might ask the attorney general to start a probe.

 

[Stuck_At_Work]

It's now official. Clemens is screwed. Canseco is also in big trouble.

 

[Perham1]

Oh Roger, why didn't you just tell the truth to start with? Set aside your pride and ego. But that's a bit like asking a leopard to change his spots.

 

[Truck's Son]

Unbelievable.

 

[Rockinghorse]

It could be a picture of Clemens holding up that day's Miami Herald and his lawyers will find a way to argue that it's inadmissable.

 

[C-Man]

And now he's ******. He deserves the same fate as Bonds.

 

[Mr.Wizard]

I heard he 11 year old boy is a lying opprotunist.

 

[Seattle Husker]

[eflow]That 11yr old boy has admitted to using drugs and lying to his parents during his teenage years so he obviously has no credibility. [/eflow]

 

[Jive_Turkey]

[clemens] Those photos are doctored. Clearly a photoshop. Where are the negatives? That could have been a different party. Plus, it's an 11 year old. He's not reliable. [/apologist]

 

[eflow24]

Have fun with me if you want, I can take it, but we can look when we actually see these photos. Remember, you are talking about a McNamee camp that has not done anything they have threatened this whole time. (Still haven't filed any law suits against Roger)

Forgive me if I am going to believe Roger's nanny, Roger & Canseco over anything McNamee says. Exactly why would Canseco have a reason to lie?

Once we see the photo's then I may change my mind. It still amazes me how people take every little thing that McNamee says as the gospel truth.

 

[Beau Vine]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Hayden_Horn]

red five,

he didn't "mishear," he "misremembered." get with the program

 

[madscientist]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[BA93]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Ramathorn]

why would Canseco lie for Roger though? I don't get that part.

 

[Napoleon]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[TexLaw04]

The photo can be found here:

The Link

 

[Tyler Durden]

That photo was awesome and disappointing at the same time.

 

[Ramathorn]

Judging by that photo, it's boggs that is on the roids. No doubt.

 

[Ralphie]

i'll reserve judgment until I see the photos. Do they have a date stamp? I'm assuming Canseco has had more than one party.

 

[Beau Vine]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[eflow24]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[cochamps]

I agree that Brian McNamee is a lying sack of ****. However, I don't think Andy misremembered anything. Particularly about Debbie Clemens doing HGH in 1999 or 2000. When the SI photo shoot was in 2003.

If that were true (which, ahem, doesn't seem likely), it still seems pretty crappy to throw your wife under the bus to save your own bacon. But then again, the whole scenario of her doing it, and Roger protecting his "temple" stretches the imagination.

 

[Mister Falcon]

Hilarious

If Clemens goes to jail, it will be for his arrogance, not for his drug use.

Eflow probably thinks OJ didn't do it.