Payroll Tax Cut Extension Passes (With Keystone)

MojoMan

1,000+ Posts
The Senate passed a two-month extension of the payroll (social security) tax cut extension today. The House also has to pass this, but that is a virtual certainty which is expected to happen early next week. President Obama has also indicated he will sign the bill.
The bill also includes a provision allowing the Keystone oil pipeline project to proceed, unless Obama specifically blocks it within 60 days. Whether Obama will block it or not will be interesting to watch. He retreated here on his insistence to include a millionaires surtax to fund the extension of the social security tax cut, and his base is not likely to be pleased with that.

Now he must make a decision (something he obviously hates doing) to either throw the environmentalists under the bus or throw the unions and his pro-job credentials under the bus. Considering the state of the economy and the rapid approach of the upcoming elections, it seems like he would want to go with the jobs and the domestic energy production. But wisdom has never been this President's strong suit, so we will have to wait and see.

As far as the tax cut extension, this is not a good idea, partially because it is cutting funding for social security, a entitlement program that is already heading towards bankruptcy, and partially because it is temporary, which means that no one will be inclined to make any hiring decisions around this sort of a short term measure.

A better idea would be to totally reform the entire tax system, but the Democrats are opposed to that idea, so that will apparently have to wait.

In reply to:


 
Obama's former National Security Adviser weighs in and says that approval of the keystone pipeline is a matter of national security:In reply to:




 
BO should have never boxed himself by firmly saying he would veto any bill that contained the Keystone quick resolution.
Now he looks weak
and with his own former national security advisor calling for it BO looks like the ineffective President he is
 
I already commented at length in a previous post, so I won't be detailed here. However, conservatives shouldn't support a tax increase and certainly shouldn't be using liberals' arguments about adequate revenue for Social Security or in general to support a tax increase. Blatantly hypocritical.
 
MrD
I am asking since I do not know.
Which Republican said there was adequate revenue for SS?
and what tax increase was there in this Senate bill?
 
What a joke. Congress can't do anything. They have been bickering over this issue for awhile now and we get only a 2 month extension. So we are guaranteed to see them bickering about this in another month and another deadline will be looming, etc, etc.

All I want to see is a balanced budget and then let Congress make the decisions needed to get there.
 
mrD

Is there adequate SS funding as funding exists now?

Any thinking person knows changes must be made to SS and I doubt you would disagree.
How is cutting revenue to SS helping SS?
In this case this was just moving the goal post 2 mons ahead BUT it also got the keystone pipeline issue to the front so it ain't all bad.

if there isn't a tax increae in this bill( the subject of the OP) what was your point about a tax increase?
 

NEW: Pro Sports Forums

Cowboys, Texans, Rangers, Astros, Mavs, Rockets, etc. Pro Longhorns. The Chiefs and that Swift gal. This is the place.

Pro Sports Forums

Recent Threads

Back
Top