Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
InterferenceFailed two point conversion. Sooners were lucky. The QB put the pass for two on the receivers hands, but the ou DB made a great play to break it up. Damn it.
Yes, I saw that on the replay. But as the announcer said, the refs won't call bumping and jostling on that play.Interference
You're very, very good at finding things to ***** and whine about. It must be your superpower.Even if we win out, if Baylor beats OU we lose all tie-breakers; as OU will not lose 3 games. TCU doesn't have the offense to outscore OU, and OSU never beats them. That means we have to pull for OU to win. *#^&*&^%$@#$%
Someone's not on the train.You're very, very good at finding things to ***** and whine about. It must be your superpower.
Obvious Pass Interference. Clearly Big 12 officials have been (again) told to protect Zero U in order to have a chance to have a Big 12 champion in the playoffs.OU interferes with receiver on the two point try but it's not called.
That train has probably left the station with the LSU win. If aOSU, Clemson, and LSU all finish undefeated, Alabama will be the 1 loss team in the CFP.Obvious Pass Interference. Clearly Big 12 officials have been (again) told to protect Zero U in order to have a chance to have a Big 12 champion in the playoffs.
Baylor wont beat OU.Even if we win out, if Baylor beats OU we lose all tie-breakers; as OU will not lose 3 games. TCU doesn't have the offense to outscore OU, and OSU never beats them. That means we have to pull for OU to win. *#^&*&^%$@#$%
We will hear alot about the "good loss" for Bama....but I believe as much or more weight should be on strength of schedule.That train has probably left the station with the LSU win. If aOSU, Clemson, and LSU all finish undefeated, Alabama will be the 1 loss team in the CFP.
We will hear alot about the "good loss" for Bama....but I believe as much or more weight should be on strength of schedule.
Not sure who that would benefit but not Bama, and I've always been opposed to putting in a team that doesn't even qualify for their own CCG.
Good argument/points.Bama will have enough strength of schedule and their loss is to #1. OU losing to KSU sunk that ship. I think a 1 loss Big team has a strong chance over OU. If OU wins out their best win will be against Baylor. They played no one in non-conf.
I would totally agree Minnesota should get a look. I was mainly saying OU sunk their ship with a loss to KSU. Their real problem is they aren't playing teams like we are in non-conf. We can lose a regular season game as long as we win against the likes of LSU and still get in. OUs margin for error is smaller. Last year the conference was stronger so they had a stronger SOS. This year if your best win is against Baylor no ones going to care. Only reason Baylor is undefeated is because the Big 12 refs don't know the rules. If they had their rightful loss to TT, they're sitting around 20 and a loss to OU would kick them out of the top 25.Good argument/points.
Just for the sake of argument...What about a 1 loss Ohio State, Georgia or Minnesota vs Bamas record and schedule?
I'm not impressed with Oregon much. But I guess they have to get a look, too. ..Nah. lol
Again, I just dont like seeing a team in without making their CCG.
What if Minnesotas only loss is to a #2 or 1 Ohio State...and have victory over #5??
Against Bamas resume I mean....not reputation..resume.
Could get weird...Georgia beats LSU in CCG...Georgia and LSU in and Bama stays home.
$EC trumps everything including strength of schedule. Unless the CFP Committee has a come to Jesus moment, the highest-ranked $EC one-loss team will get the nod over all other one-loss teams. Oregon/Clemson would be a good semi-final game but at best they would be 3 and 4 so they could not meet until the final.Good argument/points.
Just for the sake of argument...What about a 1 loss Ohio State, Georgia or Minnesota vs Bamas record and schedule?
I'm not impressed with Oregon much. But I guess they have to get a look, too. ..Nah. lol
Again, I just dont like seeing a team in without making their CCG.
What if Minnesotas only loss is to a #2 or 1 Ohio State...and have victory over #5??
Against Bamas resume I mean....not reputation..resume.
Could get weird...Georgia beats LSU in CCG...Georgia and LSU in and Bama stays home.
I think this is true.Obvious Pass Interference. Clearly Big 12 officials have been (again) told to protect Zero U in order to have a chance to have a Big 12 champion in the playoffs.
Agree but dont like it$EC trumps everything including strength of schedule. Unless the CFP Committee has a come to Jesus moment, the highest-ranked $EC one-loss team will get the nod over all other one-loss teams. Oregon/Clemson would be a good semi-final game but at best they would be 3 and 4 so they could not meet until the final.
Of course, we can always hope Baylor goes undefeated, somehow jumps from 12th to 4th, and where LSU would make the Miami/Texas Cotton Bowl game look good.
I almost always agree with you...in instances like that...Momentum is overrated, undefinable, swings back and forth constantly, and there is no evidence that scoring last in regulation, even multiple times in a row, affects your overtime odds.
I'm with you normally, Stat, but this setup looked like a tie the game and take OU to overtime to me. Their defense was gassed and ISU was very confident and having their way on offense...also had held OU to very little offensively down the stretch. This wasnt WVU-Texas or NC-Clemson.Momentum is overrated, undefinable, swings back and forth constantly, and there is no evidence that scoring last in regulation, even multiple times in a row, affects your overtime odds.
True, but none of them deny the stealing of land and getting away with that either.A lot of posters on gooner boards were saying it was PI and they got away with it.
I'm not quite sure what your're point is with your first sentence but my point was a lot of people thought it was a penalty. Even gooners.True, but none of them deny the stealing of land and getting away with that either.
Yep, we stole it and got away with it. Let's embrace it and name the university after it.
Really? Well, it was supposed to be a joke. You know what "Sooner" refers to, right? They won the game, so admitting later that it was PI is no big deal. Would they admit it was PI had it been called and then they lost?I'm not quite sure what your're point is with your first sentence but my point was a lot of people thought it was a penalty. Even gooners.