Obama's NLRB threatens Boeing workers' jobs

[A. BETTIK]

From WSJ:The Link

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Leftwith]

Disgusting.

 

[Sangre Naranjada]

How do we start a recall election for the POTUS?

That fuckstick is a disaster.

 

[TexasGolf]

wow just wow

 

[Leftwith]

Any of you libsters want to defend this fascist ********?

 

[general35]

Nikki isnt likey to get an answer and the press it is doubtful the press will ask. This is a big story only like every other sleezy operation by the obama administration, it doesnt get any coverage. guess how many network or cable stories there have been on this other than fox?

 

[SomeMildLanguage]

Worst President ever.

 

[Oilfield]

I knew this guy was in no way prepared to be POTUS. However, I never imagined we would have a President that is absolutely owned by the unions. So pathetic.

 

[YoLaDu]

i guess i am a glutton for punishment. As usual, there is two sides to every story and so far the vast majority of what has been written has presented only one side. I understand why Gov. Haley would be upset, but she drammatized her op-ed and distorted the facts to gain sympathy.

from the op-ed:

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Horn6721]

We know boeing had hired over 2,000 people at the Seattle location since they strted building the plant in SC so it would be hard to say placing this production line in SC cost anyone in Seattle their job.

One result of the NLRB action has been to halt progress in SC which of course also halts hiring in SC.

Hard to see this has anything but payback by Obama to unions. Unions he will really need for 2012

 

[SomeMildLanguage]

I don't know how anyone other than hard left big labor bosses could support this President at this point.

 

[majorwhiteapples]

Call it what you want the NLRB's intentions are to hamper Boeings efforts in any Right to Work state in any way shape or form. If you don't believe that or recognize that then you are sadly blind.

 

[Horn6721]

Busier than any union bees could be now the NLRB is seeking to overturn a Voter approved law that would guarantee secret ballots for union voting in both South Dakota and Ariz.
So voters in some sttes voted to make sure people voting in union elections could cast their vote secretly. You know like we all get to do in general elections and yet Obama's NLRB is against secret voting.
Anyone WHY would unions be against secret balloting?

 

[Leftwith]

In reply to:

---

---

 

[Namewithheld]

ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES

BHO is an unmitigated disaster that will be hamper the US for years after he is defeated in 2012. Remember this when the GOP puts up someone to run against this disgrace for a President.

What is going to be interesting is how big a broom will be needed to clean out all the Democrat sludge in the Government agencies.