I have 2 questions about this massive Solyndra F'up by Obama and his minions.
1. Why was it structured that if Solyndra went bankrupt the private investors for money first?
from WSJ
'Under the restructuring, the DOE agreed that in the event of a default and liquidation, the government would be paid after private creditors providing a new $69 million loan that the company said it needed to stay afloat.
The deal was unusual for the U.S., which is usually the most senior creditor in any type of loan or guarantee."
2. What is revealed in these emails that ahould make any Obama suporter puke?
From Wapo
A White House official fretted privately that the Obama administration could suffer serious political damage if it gave additional taxpayer support to the beleaguered solar-panel company Solyndra, according to newly released e-mails.
and this from the OMIB- I thought the OMB was " non-partisan"?
"“The optics of a Solyndra default will be bad,” the Office of Management and Budget staff member wrote Jan. 31 in an e-mail to a co-worker. “If Solyndra defaults down the road, the optics will be arguably worse later than they would be today. . . . In addition, the timing will likely coincide with the 2012 campaign season heating up.”
The Link
Where in any of the information coming from the obama WH is any concern for huge loss of taxpayer money?
1. Why was it structured that if Solyndra went bankrupt the private investors for money first?
from WSJ
'Under the restructuring, the DOE agreed that in the event of a default and liquidation, the government would be paid after private creditors providing a new $69 million loan that the company said it needed to stay afloat.
The deal was unusual for the U.S., which is usually the most senior creditor in any type of loan or guarantee."
2. What is revealed in these emails that ahould make any Obama suporter puke?
From Wapo
A White House official fretted privately that the Obama administration could suffer serious political damage if it gave additional taxpayer support to the beleaguered solar-panel company Solyndra, according to newly released e-mails.
and this from the OMIB- I thought the OMB was " non-partisan"?
"“The optics of a Solyndra default will be bad,” the Office of Management and Budget staff member wrote Jan. 31 in an e-mail to a co-worker. “If Solyndra defaults down the road, the optics will be arguably worse later than they would be today. . . . In addition, the timing will likely coincide with the 2012 campaign season heating up.”
The Link
Where in any of the information coming from the obama WH is any concern for huge loss of taxpayer money?