orangecat1
500+ Posts
I made my suggested cuts to 2012-13 budget last night. Yes, 12-13, this will be the tough year, because there won't be any 831 million $ to bail us out next year.
The CFO is very smart, but he has already hinted at his next strategy. We're at the state maximum for tax rate right now, at 1.54.
He mentioned the words "tax election" at least 3 times. My main objective at the presentation was to let the school board know that we are overpaying our administration.
I recommended over $1,000,000 of cuts, of which over 400k came just from reducing highly paid administration salaries. I cut and pasted from Texastribune.org part of the table that showed McKinney has a median salary of 48,200(#2 on the list of ISDs in the area of districts with #s of employees from 1000 to 6000) despite the fact that our supt. has a salary of 220k, one of the lowest on the list.
iow, we're the 2nd highest in admin salaries of the districts surveyed, the only one higher is Plano, and it costs a lot more to live in Plano than it does in McKinney.
in short we have too many highly paid administrators.
In my plan I combined small administration departments.
My plan saves 21 teachers jobs, lays off 5 unnecessary admin. employees, and does so without touching the big 5:
1. stipends
2. instructional specialists
3. counselors
4. librarians
5. assistant principals.
This is where the big money is. Now that I know the CFOs next move, I just need to get the tea party involved.
I can see it now. The CFO is gonna convince the board that they've made all the cuts they can make, and we have to have a tax election or we will have to lay off 200 teachers. Meanwhile they are continuing the same old stipends and exorbitant administration pay.
Once I get the tea party involved, this should be interesting.
The CFO is very smart, but he has already hinted at his next strategy. We're at the state maximum for tax rate right now, at 1.54.
He mentioned the words "tax election" at least 3 times. My main objective at the presentation was to let the school board know that we are overpaying our administration.
I recommended over $1,000,000 of cuts, of which over 400k came just from reducing highly paid administration salaries. I cut and pasted from Texastribune.org part of the table that showed McKinney has a median salary of 48,200(#2 on the list of ISDs in the area of districts with #s of employees from 1000 to 6000) despite the fact that our supt. has a salary of 220k, one of the lowest on the list.
iow, we're the 2nd highest in admin salaries of the districts surveyed, the only one higher is Plano, and it costs a lot more to live in Plano than it does in McKinney.
in short we have too many highly paid administrators.
In my plan I combined small administration departments.
My plan saves 21 teachers jobs, lays off 5 unnecessary admin. employees, and does so without touching the big 5:
1. stipends
2. instructional specialists
3. counselors
4. librarians
5. assistant principals.
This is where the big money is. Now that I know the CFOs next move, I just need to get the tea party involved.
I can see it now. The CFO is gonna convince the board that they've made all the cuts they can make, and we have to have a tax election or we will have to lay off 200 teachers. Meanwhile they are continuing the same old stipends and exorbitant administration pay.
Once I get the tea party involved, this should be interesting.