Wulaw Horn
1,000+ Posts
In his first bracketology he has syracuse as a 2 seed, Gonzaga as a 2 seed and Texas as a 3 seed (updated yesterday night)
He says that bracketology is not ever based upon projection but what a team has accomplished.
What are Gonzaga's great wins that match up to beating UCLA, at Wisconsin and basically at Nova as well as some decent mid level wins?
And syracuse hasn't beaten a ranked team (unless you count memphis depending on the poll) and they have wins against name programs but not great teams in Kansas and Florida this year. Those teams (this year) are long on name and short on ability. Decent wins, but nothing special.
To think that with no great scalps on the wall, but losses to Cleveland State and Portland State you would see Syracuse or Gonzaga on a 2 line is absolutely absurd.
His 1's are Pitt, UNC, Oklahoma and UConn, not surprising in any way. I'm hopeful we can get Oklahoma's 1 seed.
He says that bracketology is not ever based upon projection but what a team has accomplished.
What are Gonzaga's great wins that match up to beating UCLA, at Wisconsin and basically at Nova as well as some decent mid level wins?
And syracuse hasn't beaten a ranked team (unless you count memphis depending on the poll) and they have wins against name programs but not great teams in Kansas and Florida this year. Those teams (this year) are long on name and short on ability. Decent wins, but nothing special.
To think that with no great scalps on the wall, but losses to Cleveland State and Portland State you would see Syracuse or Gonzaga on a 2 line is absolutely absurd.
His 1's are Pitt, UNC, Oklahoma and UConn, not surprising in any way. I'm hopeful we can get Oklahoma's 1 seed.