from link"Iran Calls Obama a Liar; They May Have a Point
The White House released a “fact sheet” that purported to summarize the deal it reached with Iran. It is telling that the administration’s summary is actually longer than the agreement itself; it contains a good deal of argument and wishful thinking. Like this:
Today, the P5+1 and Iran reached a set of initial understandings that halts the progress of Iran’s nuclear program and rolls it back in key respects.
That simply isn’t true. During the six months that this temporary agreement is intended to last, Iran’s nuclear program will not be halted. On the contrary, Iran will be permitted to enrich as much uranium as it chooses, and as its technical capacity permits, to 5%. And, as we noted here 5% enrichment represents 90% of the effort required to create nuclear weapons-grade uranium. So the Iranian nuclear program will not be “halted.”
Iran published the actual text of the agreement in English, which we linked to here. It is revealing, I think, that Iran’s government publishes the text of the government wherever possible, while ours does not. That suggests which government is proud of it. Iran published the actual text of the agreement in English, which we linked to here. It is revealing, I think, that Iran’s government publishes the text of the government wherever possible, while ours does not. That suggests which government is proud of it. "
in the link the writer points out parts of BO's release that he calls puzzling compared to the actual agreement.
One notable point is the fact that the agreement is NOT even in effect yet
and this last sentence in link sums it up well
"One yearns for the good old days when, if there was a conflict between the U.S. government and Iran’s mullahs, you could assume it was the American government that was telling the truth."The Link
The White House released a “fact sheet” that purported to summarize the deal it reached with Iran. It is telling that the administration’s summary is actually longer than the agreement itself; it contains a good deal of argument and wishful thinking. Like this:
Today, the P5+1 and Iran reached a set of initial understandings that halts the progress of Iran’s nuclear program and rolls it back in key respects.
That simply isn’t true. During the six months that this temporary agreement is intended to last, Iran’s nuclear program will not be halted. On the contrary, Iran will be permitted to enrich as much uranium as it chooses, and as its technical capacity permits, to 5%. And, as we noted here 5% enrichment represents 90% of the effort required to create nuclear weapons-grade uranium. So the Iranian nuclear program will not be “halted.”
Iran published the actual text of the agreement in English, which we linked to here. It is revealing, I think, that Iran’s government publishes the text of the government wherever possible, while ours does not. That suggests which government is proud of it. Iran published the actual text of the agreement in English, which we linked to here. It is revealing, I think, that Iran’s government publishes the text of the government wherever possible, while ours does not. That suggests which government is proud of it. "
in the link the writer points out parts of BO's release that he calls puzzling compared to the actual agreement.
One notable point is the fact that the agreement is NOT even in effect yet
and this last sentence in link sums it up well
"One yearns for the good old days when, if there was a conflict between the U.S. government and Iran’s mullahs, you could assume it was the American government that was telling the truth."The Link
