I'm curious what others think about why it would be neccessary to have double barbed wire fences, guard posts, and mounted patrols for a "dislocated civiilans" camp? If it's a bunch of people that get displaced because of say an earthquake, flood, volcanoe, etc why hold them like military prisoners?
I tried to find the 2007 version but you have to buy it
This kind of plan has apparently been around since 1996 and seems to lump military prisoners and civilian detainees or displaced.
I can see that if you are building a facility you'd build it to house any type of detainee
the really interesting part here is how they plan to ' indoctrinate" or " retrain" these people
A nice, spiral-bound hard copy of this manual would make a thoughtful gift for any Japanese Americans you may know. It would also be a touching gift for anyone left homeless after Hurricane Katrina. Yes, this manual is sure to become a treasured keepsake for anyone who appreciates the great care and planning the U.S. government takes to provide for the freedom and well being of its people.
The writing of the manual probably gave 10 people a government job for a year. Is this what the government talks about when it says that it needs new sources of revenue to build infrastructure?
It looks like this concept has been around since at lest 1996 and periodically gets updated.
I can't download any of the older versions to find out if this version is substantially changed.I can see the need to have plans for this
I can't see the need to put civilians in a place with barbedwire and guard towers that house machine guns.
mwa
Of course we have to have plans to house large numbers ofd civilians in the event of an unthinkable disaster as well as to perhaps house large numbers of prisoners of war.
i doubt having large number of prisoners of war is even going to happen but neither is going to war with the UK. I bet we have palsn for that as well
I have 2 questions about this plan. Why would it be necessary to have civilians in a prison like camp with gun towers
and what is the difference between ' military prisoners" and "prisoners of war"?
Both categories are mentioned in that report.
If this has been around for at least 20 years what is different about this newest planning guide?