Interesting Geopolitical Observations by Juan Cole

Bevo Incognito

5,000+ Posts
From Juan's outstanding blog:


The selection of Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Argentina as the new pope signals the first time the Roman Catholic Church has been headed by a non-European since St. Gregory III (d. 741), who was what we would today call either a Lebanese or a Syrian. (Of course, the church holds that a Palestinian was the first pope).

The decision of the cardinals is significant not just for the Roman Catholic Church but as part of the emergence in the 21st century of the global South as a center of power, economic growth, and cultural influence. When exactly Europe began surpassing other world areas in these regards is controversial in economic history, but it was in any case several hundred years ago. The North’s dominance was extended by its other rising powers of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Russia and the United States, which dominated the world in the second half of the twentieth century.

But every indication is that the global South — Latin America, Africa and Asia — will increasingly make itself felt in the coming century. Here are the signs pointing to this change:

1. 42% of the world’s Roman Catholics live in Latin America.

2. The number of Catholics in Africa has more than tripled since 1978, to 176 million, or about 15% of the total.

3. Sometime in the next decade, China’s gross domestic product will likely surpass that of the United States, making it the world’s largest economy. The United States had been the world’s largest economy since 1890, when it surpassed . . . China.

4. Brazil’s gross domestic product is bigger than that of Britain.

5. India will likely be the world’s largest consumer market by 2030.

6. India is already the world’s largest producer of films, and enjoys some of the soft power benefits of the popularity of Bollywood around the world. It produces around 3000 films a year, including around 1300 feature films.

7. But Hollywood is still no. 2 for the production of feature films, right? No, it is now Nigeria.

8. The North is likely to lose population or at most remain stable in the next 40 years, but the world is likely to go from its present 6.8 billion to 9.2 billion by 2050. Africa’s population will likely double in that time, and almost all the growth will come in the global South. In turn, that development will make northerners a small minority of some 1.5 billion, about a 6th of the total. The typical human being 40 years from now will be an Asian from India, China or Indonesia.

9. Nearly a third of humankind could well be Muslim by mid-century.

10. In 1905, both the US and Germany for the first time out-produced Britain in steel, which historians see as a turning point in the history of geopolitics. But in 2013, the Chinese produce more steel than all of Europe and the US combined. Even India alone is probably only a few years away from producing more steel annually than the US, and it already out-produces Russia and Germany.
 
The problem with that thesis, as I see it, is one of political coherence and political institutions. He refers to the "global South as a center of power", but in fact there is no center to speak of, either in terms of geography or in terms of political sentiment. Nor does the term South really work if he's going to include China to make his case, since China lies entirely north of the equator. The only unifying principle in play, apparently, is the principle of negation--specifically, the principle of "not X", where X is any society whose political, cultural, and economic institutions are products of the European Enlightenment.

A better term than "South" might be "periphery", and it is worth noting that the periphery has always had more population and material resources than the Enlightenment center.

Cole's thesis is a re-statement of the long-dreamed-of post-colonial fantasy. And many a post-colonial fantasy has been dashed upon the rocks of sub-Saharan and Latin American political chaos, which seems to cycle between anarchy, authoritarianism, and (in some cases) tribalism.

There are historical reasons for this which have not entirely disappeared. It could be argued that this chaos has become institutionalized in the last century. Alternatively, it could be argued that this chaos is inherent to the cultural assumptions of the peoples in these regions.

Either way, the problem of political dysfunction will have to be overcome if the post-colonial fantasy is to be realized. I'm not saying it can't be done. But it's not the slam dunk that the blogger seems to suggest.
 
To add to Coel's point, the author also seriously stretches to make a case. Steel? Steel is a commodity in today's world. With commodities come low profit margins. Steel left America half a century ago because our labor costs were too high. Since that time the US has purchased much of its steel from Eastern Europe (in places like Ostrava, Czech Republic) and Asia. The point is that steel production isn't the sign of a developed country but the sign of a developing country, one that is modern enough to have good manufacturing techniques and political stability but still poor enough to have cheap labor. To say that steel manufacturing is the sign of a change in power from the US to other countries is wrong. It simply means that in today's world, steel manufacturing does not provide enough profit for American workers and the US has had to move on to more profitable markets.
 
Coel, one thing I think you missed South America has been influenced by the European Enlightenment. I think to the blogger, the "South" really means "not-white" from his perspective. Of course many in Latin America think of themselves as white though.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top