I'd like to raise a practical question...

It's such a fine line between clever . . . and stupid.


We've taken a sophisticated view of sex . . .

And put it on a farm?
 
I don't really think that the end can be assessed as of itself as being the end because what does the end feel like?
 
David St. Hubbins: I do not, for one, think that the problem was that the band was down. I think that the problem *may* have been, that there was a Stonehenge monument on the stage that was in danger of being *crushed* by a *dwarf*. Alright? That tended to understate the hugeness of the object.

Ian Faith: I really think you're just making much too big a thing out of it.

Derek Smalls: Making a big thing out of it would have been a good idea.
 
Well, I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation.
 
spinal_tap_security.jpg
 
My job is not to interpret napkins. My job is to follow the direction of the creative element of this band. If Nigel put inches instead of feet, that's not my problem!

Well, yeah but you're not as confused as Nigel, are you?
 
"This tasteless cover is a good indication of the lack of musical invention within. The musical growth of this band cannot even be charted. They are treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top