Hi, I'm Paul Ryan, I lost the election and...

Is this supposed to be news? The article gives zero context - just spouts Democratic slogans. Why no mention of how much debt would be accrued over the next ten years under Ryan's budget and Murray's? Is it because readers would see how how relatively nominal the deficit reduction actually is under Murray's plan?

Interestingly, if you read all the way to the bottom, the Bolsheviks who wrote this piece of **** article concede that Ryan is preserving the $600 tax increase passed in January. So where are the "tax-breaks for the wealthy" in the Ryan budget? I don't see any.

Nevertheless, I don't have a problem with ripping Ryan's budget priorities. Let's see the Democratic balanced budget plan and debate the merits of both. Oh wait, they don't have one. In fact, theirs barely even makes a dent in the budget deficit.
 
What does Roger35 and the Dem's have against a balanced budget.

Hell, why is it the Dems don't have a budget at all, balanced or unbalanced?
 
77
apparently after 1400 days the Dems in the senate do have a budget
I say apparently because so far they haven't given it to the Pub Senators to read.
 
Sure he lost the election, but he's still a Congressman and one of the most able as far as I can tell.

All I know about Ryan's budget is that he claims it'll balance the budget in 10 years. To do that you have to slash entitlements, of course. Sounds like a good thing to me.
 
And here you have the Administration's position, straight from the horse's mouth - The Link. Unless, of course, you think of Obama as the other end of the horse...

HHD
hookem.gif
texasflag.gif
coolnana.gif
ousucksnana.gif
 
Yea, Romney and Ryan lost the election because of the budget proposals, yea that is the reason.

Ryan is one of the few Congressman that is leveling with the American people, either by choice or forced down our throats, Ryan's budget policies will be enacted. We can choose them now or they will be forced because the US has started defauting on it's debts.

Don't forget, yea, $16T in Debt, don't even get me started on the missing $60T in unfunded entitlements that Politicians have been stealing from for years, there is no vault where they have been keeping your SS money, they have been spending it faster than it comes in....I am sure you have heard about those companies that had these pensions and then they didn't have your pension anymore, well that is the USA right now boys.

You better start listening to Ryan, especially if you are planning on living or counting SS or Medicaid for your retirement.
 
Every time you post you prove that though you think you are smart, you are definitely not. A little parrot. Squawk. Squawk.
Pathetic.
 
There is nothing I don't like about the Ryan budget, and a lot I don't like about the Senate's Democratic-backed budget.
Here is the Democrat's plan in the Senate. If this doesn't scare the **** out of you and make you sick to your stomach, nothing will.
In reply to:
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
If deficits don't matter, let's just give everyone a tax holiday for the entire year and see how that extra money stimulates the economy.
 
I don't know why you guys even entertain Roger35, he's the local village idiot with whom there is no hope of reasoning with. put more people in charge who think like him and we'll be 25 trillion in debt in 4-5 years.
 
^^^^^^^

This. Like the village idiot part, and just hope I don't live anywhere near his village. He is the poster whose name I can't remember that we finally realized was in middle school. Which explains a lot. You can change a screen name, but not your intelligence level.
 
The US collects a total of $5.6 trillion in taxes.
By comparison Germany's GDP is $3.57 trillion.

In other words, we collect 1.5X more in taxes than Germany produces. If we got every dime Germany received from beer and BMW's etc., our government could survive for half a year. Clearly our government doesn't get enough money.
 
Roger35 proves the point that you don't have to win an argument on the merits, or on logic, or in any normal sense of what most of us think of when we think of "winning". There is such a thing as achieving parity with your adversary by virtue of persistent equivocation.

In other words, you don't have to be right. You just have to keep up the appearance that you're not losing heart even as the other guy repeatedly demonstrates that you're wrong. Obama used this strategy to great effect back in the fall regarding the Benghazi affair. Being wrong only matters to those capable of distinguishing between quality arguments and foolish arguments.

There's a certain segment of our population that this sort of tactic works on. That's mostly because they're incapable of following the logic in the first place. They're not liberals, exactly, but there's lots of sub-80 IQs out there, and those are votes that liberals need. I suspect lots of them like to think of themselves as independents.

So I'm beginning to think that Roger35 knows what he's doing, in a perverse sort of way. It's a sickness, of course. But there is a method to it. I just find it hard to believe that a person can be that consistently foolish. Fools aren't normally that consistent in terms of method.
 
HornHuskerDad - you're right! Their names both start with R. Coincidence? I don't think so. He may be in high school now, although undoubtably a remedial one.
biggrin.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top