L
longtex
Guest
... what would it be?
This is an easy one for me: the offside rule. I hate this ******* thing. It's ostensibly about "fair play", but I fail to see what getting behind the defense has to do with fairness - or sportsmanship or gentlemanliness. Maybe it's arguable that doing away with it would reward speed at the expense of ball-handling (I mean, ball-footling, I guess), but I'm not so sure that's a bad thing.
It would certainly change tactics quite a bit, and it would do away with one of the most aggravating game-changing calls, often so close as to be argued ceaselessly... and it would raise scores, which in most minds might be the best argument of all for getting rid of the rule.
That's mine - what's yours?
This is an easy one for me: the offside rule. I hate this ******* thing. It's ostensibly about "fair play", but I fail to see what getting behind the defense has to do with fairness - or sportsmanship or gentlemanliness. Maybe it's arguable that doing away with it would reward speed at the expense of ball-handling (I mean, ball-footling, I guess), but I'm not so sure that's a bad thing.
It would certainly change tactics quite a bit, and it would do away with one of the most aggravating game-changing calls, often so close as to be argued ceaselessly... and it would raise scores, which in most minds might be the best argument of all for getting rid of the rule.
That's mine - what's yours?