Election Coverage

[austintexas]

CNN by far has the best election coverage, IMO. Their graphics are unmatched. Brazile, Bennett, Anderson Cooper, Blitzer, et. al. all are doing a great job. And it's in HD.

MSNBC's twin doosch sacs (Matthews and Olbermann) are, well, they're dooschness has been exhausted on this board, I think. Nothing more I can add.

Fox has some good, talented folks, but their breakdowns, info, graphics, etc all fall way short of CNN, IMO.

That telestrator map of CNNs is sweet.

 

[Texas_Curl]

i like cnn's interactive map, too. the fox show is a little stodgy compared to cnn. their analysis is as good, i suppose, but they could update the tools they use.

hook'em

 

[SomeMildLanguage]

The HD makes a huge difference.

 

[FirstTimeLurker]

yes

 

[FirstTimeLurker]

test

 

[RyanUTAustin]

I would have to agree.

I am getting kind of sick of hearing Wolf Blitzer say "the best political team on television."

It is really annoying.

I like Olbermann and Matthews.

 

[wildcat09]

The level of douchiness at Fox is equal to the level of douchiness at MSNBC and both are only slightly ahead of the level of douchiness at CNN.

But I do agree, CNN looks really nice, especially in HD.

 

[PROVE EM' WRONG]

CNN's HD coverage has been badass.

 

[washparkhorn]

I watch a lot of CNN and MSNBC. Olbermann is a drama queen and Matthews is 5 seconds from being brought before a magistrate on a hate crime law. They are goofy, but entertaining.

 

[beencounting]

Wolf needs to stop his immature provocations during the debate which remind me of the skinny little nerd boy trying to instigate a schoolyard fight between 2 big boys "did you just hear what he called you!!?" .

"was that a swipe at Senator Clinton?".

"wolf, please, we are having a good time here"