Dying Iraq Vet Writes to Mssrs. Bush and Cheney

Bevo Incognito

5,000+ Posts
To: George W. Bush and Dick Cheney
From: Tomas Young

I write this letter on the 10th anniversary of the Iraq War on behalf of my fellow Iraq War veterans. I write this letter on behalf of the 4,488 soldiers and Marines who died in Iraq. I write this letter on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of veterans who have been wounded and on behalf of those whose wounds, physical and psychological, have destroyed their lives. I am one of those gravely wounded. I was paralyzed in an insurgent ambush in 2004 in Sadr City. My life is coming to an end. I am living under hospice care.

I write this letter on behalf of husbands and wives who have lost spouses, on behalf of children who have lost a parent, on behalf of the fathers and mothers who have lost sons and daughters and on behalf of those who care for the many thousands of my fellow veterans who have brain injuries. I write this letter on behalf of those veterans whose trauma and self-revulsion for what they have witnessed, endured and done in Iraq have led to suicide and on behalf of the active-duty soldiers and Marines who commit, on average, a suicide a day. I write this letter on behalf of the some 1 million Iraqi dead and on behalf of the countless Iraqi wounded. I write this letter on behalf of us all—the human detritus your war has left behind, those who will spend their lives in unending pain and grief.

I write this letter, my last letter, to you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney. I write not because I think you grasp the terrible human and moral consequences of your lies, manipulation and thirst for wealth and power. I write this letter because, before my own death, I want to make it clear that I, and hundreds of thousands of my fellow veterans, along with millions of my fellow citizens, along with hundreds of millions more in Iraq and the Middle East, know fully who you are and what you have done. You may evade justice but in our eyes you are each guilty of egregious war crimes, of plunder and, finally, of murder, including the murder of thousands of young Americans—my fellow veterans—whose future you stole.

Your positions of authority, your millions of dollars of personal wealth, your public relations consultants, your privilege and your power cannot mask the hollowness of your character. You sent us to fight and die in Iraq after you, Mr. Cheney, dodged the draft in Vietnam, and you, Mr. Bush, went AWOL from your National Guard unit. Your cowardice and selfishness were established decades ago. You were not willing to risk yourselves for our nation but you sent hundreds of thousands of young men and women to be sacrificed in a senseless war with no more thought than it takes to put out the garbage.

I joined the Army two days after the 9/11 attacks. I joined the Army because our country had been attacked. I wanted to strike back at those who had killed some 3,000 of my fellow citizens. I did not join the Army to go to Iraq, a country that had no part in the September 2001 attacks and did not pose a threat to its neighbors, much less to the United States. I did not join the Army to “liberate” Iraqis or to shut down mythical weapons-of-mass-destruction facilities or to implant what you cynically called “democracy” in Baghdad and the Middle East. I did not join the Army to rebuild Iraq, which at the time you told us could be paid for by Iraq’s oil revenues. Instead, this war has cost the United States over $3 trillion. I especially did not join the Army to carry out pre-emptive war. Pre-emptive war is illegal under international law. And as a soldier in Iraq I was, I now know, abetting your idiocy and your crimes. The Iraq War is the largest strategic blunder in U.S. history. It obliterated the balance of power in the Middle East. It installed a corrupt and brutal pro-Iranian government in Baghdad, one cemented in power through the use of torture, death squads and terror. And it has left Iran as the dominant force in the region. On every level—moral, strategic, military and economic—Iraq was a failure. And it was you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, who started this war. It is you who should pay the consequences.

I would not be writing this letter if I had been wounded fighting in Afghanistan against those forces that carried out the attacks of 9/11. Had I been wounded there I would still be miserable because of my physical deterioration and imminent death, but I would at least have the comfort of knowing that my injuries were a consequence of my own decision to defend the country I love. I would not have to lie in my bed, my body filled with painkillers, my life ebbing away, and deal with the fact that hundreds of thousands of human beings, including children, including myself, were sacrificed by you for little more than the greed of oil companies, for your alliance with the oil sheiks in Saudi Arabia, and your insane visions of empire.

I have, like many other disabled veterans, suffered from the inadequate and often inept care provided by the Veterans Administration. I have, like many other disabled veterans, come to realize that our mental and physical wounds are of no interest to you, perhaps of no interest to any politician. We were used. We were betrayed. And we have been abandoned. You, Mr. Bush, make much pretense of being a Christian. But isn’t lying a sin? Isn’t murder a sin? Aren’t theft and selfish ambition sins? I am not a Christian. But I believe in the Christian ideal. I believe that what you do to the least of your brothers you finally do to yourself, to your own soul.

My day of reckoning is upon me. Yours will come. I hope you will be put on trial. But mostly I hope, for your sakes, that you find the moral courage to face what you have done to me and to many, many others who deserved to live. I hope that before your time on earth ends, as mine is now ending, you will find the strength of character to stand before the American public and the world, and in particular the Iraqi people, and beg for forgiveness.


----- Tomas Young
 
May he find peace.
Just as I pray for peace to the others who sacrificed everything and felt it was worth it.

Each has earned the right to feel any way they want.
 
I am all for our leaders being held accountable for misdeeds and being slow to use military action due to the payment in lives. However, I can't feel much compassion Tomas Young. Why? Because he volunteered to be in the military. He wasn't forced/drafted/conscripted. When you volunteer for a fighting force you have essentially given your life to the government. If you don't want to die in a war you don't agree with or you think was a mistake, then don't volunteer for military duty. It is just insane to me. Plus even with all the debate about the Iraq War, it was pursued through "legal"/constitutional actions and the data we had pointed to the fact that there were weapons of mass destruction in the hands of a dangerous dictator. Add on top of that, we invaded Iraq for the purpose of upholding UN sanctions that the rest of the world chose to forget. Iraq had been in direct and constant violation of requirements on them from the first Gulf war to allow inspectors in their country. Once Hussein chose to end UN inspection, he forfeited his place of power. There was good reason and probable cause to go in there regardless of all the finger pointing by Democrats, after they voted to allow it. Apparently, their rhetoric worked, because it has poisoned much of the country and even some of the military against the action the Bush administration took. It worked, but it is based on personal opinion of when to start war and using hindsight to justify a position. It's silly.
 
I have to say, I do feel compassion for him as a person and for the fact that he has suffered much and is at the end of his life. That is just on our humanity. I just can't agree with his assessment of blame.
 
The vote to go to war passed in the house 297-133 and the Senate by 77-23. Voicing anger at just Bush and Cheney is not really being honest, although they were the two big figureheads so I see why he might focus on them.
 
Needs to send a letter to these folks too:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
 
No, although I will admit back in 2002 to being naive to the nature of the protracted struggle we would encounter. This is a bit shameful as I read a whole lot of history and such books are littered with examples of nations engaging in these Pyrric style of victories that yield very little benefit.

That being said, I do recall the general feeling at the time of unease with the asymmetrical impact of rogue nations operating with weapons of mass destruction. We were fresh off 9/11 and Saddam Hussein was considered a big threat. Both sides of the aisle operated under the assumption that he had WMDs and was assembling others. Inspectors had been kicked out. We had a decade of mounting aggression against the U.S. both abroad and finally at home on 9/11.

I say this as hindsight focuses on "lies about WMDs" and some narrative of Reagan era operators like Cheney and Rumsfeld settling old scores or some other nonsense. The struggles with Iraq were decades in the making and we likely assumed that any campaign would be a remake of the Balkans or the first Gulf War.

We now unfortunately know otherwise.

Interestingly to me, if Iran somehow gets a nuke and something terrible happens in the Middle East as a result, history will likely paint Bush as the one that had the right view and Obama as the appeaser who let things backslide.
 
As I said I pray he finds peace.
Many othrs do not feel the way he does.
perhaps the media will print letters from other warriors who feel their sacrifices were worth it.
 
Wasn't it thought by the previous administration that Iraq had WMD's? Wasn't it thought by Congress and the Senate in 1991 that Iraq had WMD's? So don't say Cheney cherry picked information. That's just plain ignorant. However, regarding trying to sway any Bush/Cheney hater:
deadhorse.gif
So I'm not wasting any more time on this thread. Adios.
 
I think it's interesting that the same people who jump at the idea that Bush acted maliciously and deliberately lied about his reasoning for going into Iraq (with absolutely no evidence, and in fact even when faced with the fact that Bush wasn't the only one who believed we needed to do it), and yet everything Obama does MUST be taken as being above-board, with all honesty and sincerity, and to question his motives means you must be a racist.
 
Why not just stick to the question of this one policy enacted by the Bush-Cheney administration?

Was it a good policy? How can the answer be anything other than it was a disaster?

This man's letter hits all the key points of why it was.

GOP or Dem, if you supported the people who started this war, you were wrong, but you have the excuse that you elected leaders who were supposed to know and act better than you.

The invasion of Iraq likely is one of the greatest, bloodiest, most tragic policies in our history. Had it gone the way the Bush admin said it would, would you be hailing the Dems in Congress as the heroes of that policy or would you be anxious in your zeal to give Bush all the credit?

It goes the same way with blame, my friends. The same way.
 
RV, I don't take human life lightly. Every person on the earth has intrinsic value including this soldier and including George Bush and Dick Cheney.

And you say that the Iraq War was disastrous! Of course it was disastrous! People died. Does that mean the US government should not conduct war under any circumstance? I know you are aren't saying that and wouldn't agree with that sentiment. My point being what made the Iraq War disastrous wasn't the politics involved or the fact that you didn't vote for the man in the seat of President at the time. It was disastrous because people died, but at the time and with the knowledge base that existed it wasn't as bad a decision as people are making it out to be for political reasons.
 
I would also say that I find it hard to blame anyone at this point. After 9/11, there was urgency to take care of threats to national security, whether they were linked to Al Qaeda or not. Iraq was a threat and nation state of the old variety so it was an easily identified enemy. However, I don't think that there was a good answer in existence. Bush was in a tough position. The world has been in a tough position. You can't do nothing. But the things we know to do don't resolve the issue. I am not sure I understood that in 2003 like I do now. Muslim terrorism and the nations that support them present a new challenge. They can't be allowed to operate with impunity, in violation of international law, or they will cause much harm. But you also can't go in and create a nation in your own image through force of will.

So how should we combat these threats without sending our soldiers to die and without risking being wrong about some things or make mistakes along the way? I would much rather talk about that then continue to howl at people who no longer are making decisions for our country.
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top