I'm surprised no one has brought this up.
In defense of Dewhurst, I've heard others say the following. 1.) He specifically asked for the proper procedure to be followed and never asked for a special favor. 2.) He was just calling for a relative, and he has the right to do that. 3.) Government officials frequently intervene with agencies on behalf of constituents. What's the big deal?
Now for the problems with these defenses. First, Dewhurst did ask for proper procedure, but every specific he asked for suggested that he had no intention of following the proper procedure. The proper procedure is to contact a lawyer or a bondsmen and have her bailed out. It doesn't involve calling supervisors, the Sheriff, and the County Judge on their cell phones. There is absolutely no legitimate reason to directly involve them.
Second, it is true that Dewhurst can call for a family member, but why name and title dropping? Why talk about how supportive he is of law enforcement? Why have the director of DPS call to prove "who Dewhurst is?" So what? What's the relevance of any of that except to exert influence? Also, couldn't we find a closer relative than a "step uncle in law" to make this call? Isn't there a parent, a spouse, a sibling around? The only reason to use Dewhurst is because of who he is.
Third, public officials do intervene with agencies, and I did it myself when I worked for the Legislature. However, there is a line. Compelling a state agency to deal with a constituent who is lawfully seeking service - no problem. For example, back when the Attorney General's office was collecting child support from deadbeat dads but never sending the money to the moms and refusing to speak with any of them because of bureaucratic indifference, I went to bat for my boss' constituents. That's proper legislative oversight of the state agencies.
Contacting a local law enforcement agency to try to interfere with a judicial matter? Big problem. Not only is not the right level of government, but it's a separation of powers problem. Once this woman was arrested, it became a matter for the court system, not some arrogant choad with a prominent legislative title.
Todd Staples had it right with his tweet - "Dew's call to Allen PD sounds like Anchorman Ron Burgundy: 'I don't know how to put this, but I'm kind of a big deal. People know me.'"
In defense of Dewhurst, I've heard others say the following. 1.) He specifically asked for the proper procedure to be followed and never asked for a special favor. 2.) He was just calling for a relative, and he has the right to do that. 3.) Government officials frequently intervene with agencies on behalf of constituents. What's the big deal?
Now for the problems with these defenses. First, Dewhurst did ask for proper procedure, but every specific he asked for suggested that he had no intention of following the proper procedure. The proper procedure is to contact a lawyer or a bondsmen and have her bailed out. It doesn't involve calling supervisors, the Sheriff, and the County Judge on their cell phones. There is absolutely no legitimate reason to directly involve them.
Second, it is true that Dewhurst can call for a family member, but why name and title dropping? Why talk about how supportive he is of law enforcement? Why have the director of DPS call to prove "who Dewhurst is?" So what? What's the relevance of any of that except to exert influence? Also, couldn't we find a closer relative than a "step uncle in law" to make this call? Isn't there a parent, a spouse, a sibling around? The only reason to use Dewhurst is because of who he is.
Third, public officials do intervene with agencies, and I did it myself when I worked for the Legislature. However, there is a line. Compelling a state agency to deal with a constituent who is lawfully seeking service - no problem. For example, back when the Attorney General's office was collecting child support from deadbeat dads but never sending the money to the moms and refusing to speak with any of them because of bureaucratic indifference, I went to bat for my boss' constituents. That's proper legislative oversight of the state agencies.
Contacting a local law enforcement agency to try to interfere with a judicial matter? Big problem. Not only is not the right level of government, but it's a separation of powers problem. Once this woman was arrested, it became a matter for the court system, not some arrogant choad with a prominent legislative title.
Todd Staples had it right with his tweet - "Dew's call to Allen PD sounds like Anchorman Ron Burgundy: 'I don't know how to put this, but I'm kind of a big deal. People know me.'"