Bungled Bank Bailout Leaves Behind Anger

UT1986

500+ Posts
From the former TARP inspector general.

"In the year since I stepped down as the special inspector general of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the sadly predictable consequences of the government’s disparate treatment of Wall Street and Main Street have only become worse. As the banks amass size and power, Main Street continues to get pummeled. "

"Part of the current economic malaise can be traced directly to Treasury’s betrayal of its promise to use TARP to “preserve homeownership.” The Home Affordable Modification Program has brought little meaningful improvement, with fewer than 800,000 ongoing permanent modifications as of March 31, 2012, a number that is growing at the glacial pace of just 12,000 per month. "

"In June 2011, Treasury appeared to take a tentative step toward holding the mortgage servicers accountable for the widespread misconduct in the program by pledging to withhold the incentive payments to three of the largest banks -- Wells Fargo (WFC) & Co., Bank of America Corp. (BAC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) -- until they came into compliance with HAMP’s rules."

"It is clear that the criminal-justice system has proved ill-equipped to address the financial crisis. For that, we needed effective regulatory reform. Instead, we got the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act."

"My fear about the inadequacy of Dodd-Frank has only gotten worse over the past year. The top banks are 23 percent larger than they were before the crisis. They now hold more than $8.5 trillion in assets, the equivalent of 56 percent of gross domestic product, up from 43 percent just five years ago. The risk in our banking system is remarkably concentrated in these banks, which now control 52 percent of all industry assets, up from 17 percent four decades ago. There is broad recognition that Dodd-Frank hasn’t solved the problem it was meant to address -- the power and influence of banks deemed too big to fail."

The Link
 
Several comments...first, I'm really interested in Barofsky's book "Bailout." He is extremely critical of Geithner, and also the Obama Administration (as well as the Bush Admin). He is a registered Dem, and was friendly with Paulson. Because Paulson kicked and does kick ***.

Second, this is a terrible article and thread title. The banks aren't at fault here.

Third, the last paragraph isn't sobering. It's obvious. Which banks have the balance sheets to grow rapidly? The large money center banks. The large regionals that competed heavily with the money centers are gone (Wachovia) or are reeling to a large extent. There remain 4 large American money centers. They face limited competition from regionals here, and other money centers abroad who have problems aplenty.

It is an obvious concentration, but over regulation is never an answer. That's retarded. I do agree that Dodd Frank is a ******* sham that only causes problems and stunts growth - mainly for smaller banks that have scaled back regulatory / compliance departments. In that regard, Dodd Frank is only going to enhance the growth rates of the money centers.
 
I'm aware of the article title and that is evident in your quoted text genius. Let me ask you - since we are getting real and all - how are the banks culpable in the "bungled bank bailout?"
 
I don't have a problem with the banks being this large if they are just lending institutions and not also combined with investment institutions as they are now. The investment sides are the ones making the risky bets that pose the same threat they did to us in 08. I would like to see the regulation that was in place previously be put back in place to separate these 2 entities. I would also say that if they are going to stay in their current form then they need to reverse the Paulson actions which have allowed them to over leverage themselves.
 
Wouldn't face personal liability anyway. Don't know how you think that. Also, the FDIC is funded by banks, which appears to be something of which you are unaware. Lastly, risk taking would not be impacted at all by lack of FDIC presence. Silly comment.
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top