Bradley update from Chad Ford

90 Grad

500+ Posts
Listed as the #13 draft prospect

NBA teams have been all over the place on his evaluations. A few have looked at him as a late lottery pick. Others have him as a bubble first-rounder. I've sort of split the difference all year on the Big Board and have had him consistently in the late teens to early 20s on our Top 100.

After spending two days watching him both in drills and in 3-on-3 play, I think it's time to move Bradley up into the late lottery.


I'm still not sure if he's a pure point guard, and that's a serious drawback. But everything else looks pretty good. He's super-quick and can change speeds on a dime. He showed an excellent jumper, with NBA 3-point range. He displayed the ability to score from just about everywhere on the floor. And when he got into it with the likes of Sherron Collins and Armon Johnson, his stifling defense gave them lots of problems.

Bradley measured 6-foot-1½ in socks and 6-3 in shoes, but has an impressive 6-7 wingspan, ran a blazing 3.03 seconds in a three-quarter-court sprint and showed off an impressive 37.5-inch vertical jump. Those numbers are quite similar to his two closest comps, Westbrook and San Antonio's George Hill. And like Westbrook and Hill, no one is exactly sure what position Bradley plays. He sees the floor fine, but he rarely makes a showstopping pass.

I spoke with Bradley after the workouts about his up-and-down season at Texas. He said he felt he was on par with the more heralded freshmen like Wall and Cousins. What he lacked was a coach who turned the keys over to him. Texas had seniors like Damion James and Dexter Pittman and he tried to fit in and defer to them -- a role he said Rick Barnes asked him to play.
 
Seems exactly the opposite from what Rick Barnes said to the press early on about Bradley -- where he said he was asking Bradley to assert himself more. I guess no one truly knows what was said behind closed doors.
 
Coaching or not, a guard like Bradley shouldn't have to play against the likes of Nebraska to light it up every once in a while. He had awful games against decent competition, and incredible games against patsies. That's not a recipe for success in the NBA.

He was nowhere near the likes of Wall. No one was, but Bradley wouldn't even be a distant 2nd in that equation.
 
"He's super-quick and can change speeds on a dime. He showed an excellent jumper, with NBA 3-point range. He displayed the ability to score from just about everywhere on the floor. And when he got into it with the likes of Sherron Collins and Armon Johnson, his stifling defense gave them lots of problems"

Go's back to showcasing your skills against other high rated players and relying on your ability and not thinking about makeing a mistake.
The whole team started to think about screwing up before they used their skills and ability to play ball.
Agree with Barnes quote.
 
I remember a freshman getting the keys, who was that again, Yes, I think the kids name was Durant or something like that.
wink.gif
 
He is actually nothing like Gibson. Daniel had far better ball handling and passing abilities, which isn't saying a whole lot. He's also a better 3-point shooter, though I'd assume much of Avery's struggles were due to Barnes and his mind games. Some games AB looked absolutely automatic from anywhere on the court. On the other hand, AB is a better defender, though Gibson was excellent in college, and has a better midrange game. Also he has far superior athleticism and speed.
 
few thoughts on Bradley. First, i wish him all the best in the nba. Second, bradley's stay at Texas is just one of many reasons the 1 and done rule sucks. As a fan, Bradley isn't a Longhorn to me. He never did anything for the program, he played like he knew he was leaving, and only came to Texas cause he had to spend one year somewhere, might as well be Austin. The talent level between he and Durant is light years but KD always gave the effort, and showed respect and love for the University of Texas. I wish Bradley had a better year, but from the cheap seats, i wish he would've displayed more passion or an X factor out on the court.
 
Couldn't disagree more. Bradley played harder than almost any player that's suited up for UT. He spilt his heart out, especially on defense. You are completely biased because of how we ended. While it's true AB didn't play well down the stretch, don't say it's because of a lack of effort. That is just unfair and completely untrue.
 
Maybe I was a little harsh but the way the season ended was inevitable. For some reason this team mailed it in after christmad. AB had an amazing opportunity to be a leader on the court when balbay went down and he simply didn't. I can't remember a big road win or gutted out victory that he led. I never got the impression that he wanted or could put the team on his back like TJ, KD, Wall or Rose could.
 
I agree he's not a guy that is going to dominate the game like those guys, but that's just not his style. He's quiet, reserved, and deferential. His playing style is just not one to take over a game (what those players you listed certainly do possess). That doesn't mean he doesn't care, just that his skillset is more suited to be a complementary player.
 
A complimentary player isn't that highly recruited by major programs. A complimentary player doesn't have a 1 and done mentality. 1 and dones come in and blow the doors off like KD or lead to final 4 appearances or conf championships.
 
No, they don't. Not any more and not for a long time. I think you are mixing up "1 and done" with "ready for the NBA..." Durant is the best college basketball player of all time. Stop comparing people to him, nobody fits.
 
1 and done's don't dominate any more? you mean like Rose and Wall, those guys were just complimentary?

and KD was great at UT, but he isn't the best college player of all time.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Back
Top