Arrest Warrant issued for Bill Cosby

I looked up the SOL for rape in Penn and the internet says 12 years
So, to me at least, looks like they are filing to beat the deadline
 
Bill Cosby arrested
Bill Clinton not arrested
Where is #BlackLivesMatter?

One of these is allegations is about Cosby, the other about Bill Clinton
Can you tell the difference?

CXfCuOjVAAAb8h_.png

--------------------------------

CXfCuAkUsAA6Eyo.png
 
Last edited:
The biting lip, put ice on it clip is Juanita Broaddarick and is really MORE than an allegation. At some point, I strongly suspect Bill Cosby will be held accountable for his actions as he should, Bill Clinton on the other hand won't... but I warn you, don't get me started on Clinton...
 
Last edited:
It's fairly unbelievable that Cosby is still walking around free. Usually when 30-40 people accuse you of the same crime, you get charged with something, even if you are a beloved, black, father figure.
 
It's fairly unbelievable that Cosby is still walking around free. Usually when 30-40 people accuse you of the same crime, you get charged with something...

I guess this is selfish but I will admit it anyway. Every time I read some new Cosby allegation, one of my first thoughts is always that I am thankful none of the females in my family were never anywhere near him.
 
Bill Cosby's conviction vacated by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

The state Supreme Court looked at two parts of the case that Cosby's attorneys had challenged in an appeal last year: the judge's decision to allow all five accusers to be called by prosecutors and an agreement that Cosby had with a former prosecutor that he would never be charged.

My bias is that Mr. Cosby clearly drugged multiple women and sexually assaulted them over many years. Whichever prosecutor made an agreement with BC that he would never be charged should be disbarred. I'm not sure how that's even legal or can be applied to all future prosecutors but I'm not a lawyer either.

This conviction being vacated on the surface seems to be a disservice to the women he assaulted.
 
Bill Cosby's conviction vacated by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.



My bias is that Mr. Cosby clearly drugged multiple women and sexually assaulted them over many years. Whichever prosecutor made an agreement with BC that he would never be charged should be disbarred. I'm not sure how that's even legal or can be applied to all future prosecutors but I'm not a lawyer either.

This conviction being vacated on the surface seems to be a disservice to the women he assaulted.

I'm disgusted by this, because I think he was clearly guilty. However, I'm having a hard time disagreeing with the ruling - at least if it actually is as the article says. (I haven't read the opinion.)

If the prosecution agrees not to charge him in exchange for his testimony and then breaches the agreement and charges him based on the testimony he submitted under the agreement, that seems pretty unfair, because you're basically tricking a defendant into waiving his right against self-incrimination. Let's put it this way. If it violates due process for police to say nothing (not read him his rights) and let the accused admit to his crime, then it certainly should violate due process to affirmatively induce the accused to admit to his crime as part of a deal not to charge him and then bail on the agreement. That's very sleazy. I understand that it was a different prosecutor, but the prosecutor doesn't represent himself. He represents the state, and the state is bound by him, even if there's a change in the personnel.

I view this as a huge indictment of Bruce Castor (the former prosecutor). Why the hell was he even involved in the civil suit? That looks dirty as hell. And why offer any kind of deal? The civil plaintiffs can compel Cosby's testimony. He can plead the Fifth, but unlike in a criminal case, he will do it in the presence of the jury, and the jury is allowed to infer guilt from his plea of the Fifth Amendment privilege. I smell something fishy. Was Castor getting a kickback from the civil plaintiff's lawyer to make his job easier?
 
I view this as a huge indictment of Bruce Castor (the former prosecutor). Why the hell was he even involved in the civil suit? That looks dirty as hell. And why offer any kind of deal? The civil plaintiffs can compel Cosby's testimony. He can plead the Fifth, but unlike in a criminal case, he will do it in the presence of the jury, and the jury is allowed to infer guilt from his plea of the Fifth Amendment privilege. I smell something fishy. Was Castor getting a kickback from the civil plaintiff's lawyer to make his job easier?

That's what smells to me to. A DA involved in a civil suit? It makes no sense. The only answer I can come up with is that some sort of payoff was involved.
 
This seems to be money buying justice. The PA SCOTUS decision was likely correct but the missteps by Castor seemed to have given Cosby a literal "Get out of Jail" card. This is a travesty for women who suffered under decades of his predatory behavior.
 
I'm disgusted by this, because I think he was clearly guilty. However, I'm having a hard time disagreeing with the ruling - at least if it actually is as the article says. (I haven't read the opinion.)

If the prosecution agrees not to charge him in exchange for his testimony and then breaches the agreement and charges him based on the testimony he submitted under the agreement, that seems pretty unfair, because you're basically tricking a defendant into waiving his right against self-incrimination. Let's put it this way. If it violates due process for police to say nothing (not read him his rights) and let the accused admit to his crime, then it certainly should violate due process to affirmatively induce the accused to admit to his crime as part of a deal not to charge him and then bail on the agreement. That's very sleazy. I understand that it was a different prosecutor, but the prosecutor doesn't represent himself. He represents the state, and the state is bound by him, even if there's a change in the personnel.

I view this as a huge indictment of Bruce Castor (the former prosecutor). Why the hell was he even involved in the civil suit? That looks dirty as hell. And why offer any kind of deal? The civil plaintiffs can compel Cosby's testimony. He can plead the Fifth, but unlike in a criminal case, he will do it in the presence of the jury, and the jury is allowed to infer guilt from his plea of the Fifth Amendment privilege. I smell something fishy. Was Castor getting a kickback from the civil plaintiff's lawyer to make his job easier?

Wow...i didn't realize this is the same Castor that joined Trump's impeachment team at the 11th hour.

There was no written agreement but merely Castor's verbal testimony that he had a handshake agreement with Cosby's legal team not to prosecute him. This wasn't mentioned in any statements by Castor until after he left the public sector. That dude is sleezy. I'm actually surprised that the PA SCOTUS are going simply off Castor's testimony with no written documentation to back it up.
 
While Cosby can't be retried against Andrea Constand, can't he be tried for assaulting any number of the other women who have claimed it?
 
While Cosby can't be retried against Andrea Constand, can't he be tried for assaulting any number of the other women who have claimed it?

He can if the limitations period hasn't expired. However, the prosecution won't be able to rely on the same evidence that was used in the previous case. Realistically, this is probably the end of the line.
 
Look, Slow Joe only finger raped his staff member because he's impotent and hasn't been able to get it up since about 2001. Plus since he wears diapers, his dick would smell like **** and urine anyway. Probably better for his poor employee that he only used his fingers to rape his staff, less chance of an infection.
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top