{I have gathered that any conference realignment posts are getting moved to In the Stands, so I'm posting this there to start with.}
I did not like the old Big 12 format of two 6-team divisions. Teams like OU and Nebraska lost their rivalry. The north and south teams had a definite divide that hurt conference unity.
The SEC gets around this by preserving at least one interdivisional rivalry game. Previously, they preserved two. (link)
However, why go with divisions at all and not with pods even with a 12-team conference? With pods you would have three 4-team pods (divisions/ groups/ pick you favorite term) or maybe four 3-team pods.
Example Groupings for the original Big 12:
Pod #1
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
Baylor
Pod #2
Oklahoma
Oklahoma St
Missouri
Iowa State
Pod #3
Nebraska
Colorado
Kansas St
Kansas
Play everyone in your own pod (3 games)
Play a couple of historic rivals (OU plays Texas and Nebraska).
Play 3 other conference games on some type of rotating basis
Allow the makeup of the pods to be modified to mitigate imbalances such as OU having to play perennial powers Texas and Nebraska.
Pick the top two teams to play in the conference championship game.
There are probably far better ways to organize this, but in the end, if we go back to 12 teams, I would prefer to avoid the fixed six-team divisions we previously had. Maybe it would be sufficient to just agree to rebalance the divisions every year and preserve a historic rivalry. I just don't see geography being as relevant for football. The other sports can figure out what is appropriate for them (divisions, pods, etc.).
As a football fan, I still like a 10-team conference where you play everyone else. However, this is not what the future seems to hold in the cards.
I did not like the old Big 12 format of two 6-team divisions. Teams like OU and Nebraska lost their rivalry. The north and south teams had a definite divide that hurt conference unity.
The SEC gets around this by preserving at least one interdivisional rivalry game. Previously, they preserved two. (link)
However, why go with divisions at all and not with pods even with a 12-team conference? With pods you would have three 4-team pods (divisions/ groups/ pick you favorite term) or maybe four 3-team pods.
Example Groupings for the original Big 12:
Pod #1
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
Baylor
Pod #2
Oklahoma
Oklahoma St
Missouri
Iowa State
Pod #3
Nebraska
Colorado
Kansas St
Kansas
Play everyone in your own pod (3 games)
Play a couple of historic rivals (OU plays Texas and Nebraska).
Play 3 other conference games on some type of rotating basis
Allow the makeup of the pods to be modified to mitigate imbalances such as OU having to play perennial powers Texas and Nebraska.
Pick the top two teams to play in the conference championship game.
There are probably far better ways to organize this, but in the end, if we go back to 12 teams, I would prefer to avoid the fixed six-team divisions we previously had. Maybe it would be sufficient to just agree to rebalance the divisions every year and preserve a historic rivalry. I just don't see geography being as relevant for football. The other sports can figure out what is appropriate for them (divisions, pods, etc.).
As a football fan, I still like a 10-team conference where you play everyone else. However, this is not what the future seems to hold in the cards.